From: "Marian Ďurkovič" <md@bts.sk>
To: John Heffner <johnwheffner@gmail.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: TCP rx window autotuning harmful at LAN context
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 17:00:40 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090310160040.GA93054@bts.sk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1e41a3230903100823h5d5768d9wb9f36eb294840814@mail.gmail.com>
> > Yes, but that's actual bandwidth between sender and receiver, not
> > the hard BW limit of the receiver's NIC. My intention is just to introduce
> > some safety belt preventing autotuning to increase the rx window
> > into MB ranges when RTT is very low.
>
> Nowhere in our proposal do you use NIC bandwidth. What you proposed
> can be done easily at the sender.
Only if you *absolutely* trust the sender to do everything correctly.
That's never the case on global scale - some senders are buggy, some teribly
outdated, some incorrectly configured, some using different congestion
control scheme...
Again, autotuning in its present form removes all safety at the receiver
side and allows senders to easily bring LANs down. IMHO we need to fix
this before the problem spreads even more.
Thanks & kind regards,
M.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-03-10 16:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-03-09 11:25 TCP rx window autotuning harmful at LAN context Marian Ďurkovič
2009-03-09 18:01 ` John Heffner
2009-03-09 20:05 ` Marian Ďurkovič
2009-03-09 20:24 ` Stephen Hemminger
2009-03-10 0:09 ` David Miller
2009-03-10 0:34 ` Rick Jones
2009-03-10 3:55 ` John Heffner
2009-03-10 17:20 ` Rick Jones
2009-03-11 10:03 ` Andi Kleen
2009-03-11 11:03 ` Marian Ďurkovič
2009-03-11 13:30 ` David Miller
2009-03-11 15:01 ` Andi Kleen
2009-03-11 14:56 ` Marian Ďurkovič
2009-03-11 15:34 ` John Heffner
[not found] ` <20090309195906.M50328@bts.sk>
2009-03-09 20:23 ` John Heffner
2009-03-09 20:33 ` Stephen Hemminger
2009-03-09 23:52 ` David Miller
2009-03-10 0:09 ` John Heffner
2009-03-10 5:19 ` Eric Dumazet
[not found] ` <20090310104956.GA81181@bts.sk>
2009-03-10 11:30 ` David Miller
2009-03-10 11:46 ` Marian Ďurkovič
2009-03-10 15:23 ` John Heffner
2009-03-10 16:00 ` Marian Ďurkovič [this message]
2009-03-10 16:18 ` David Miller
2009-03-11 8:29 ` Marian Ďurkovič
2009-03-11 8:41 ` David Miller
2009-03-11 9:05 ` Marian Ďurkovič
2009-03-11 9:11 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-03-11 13:25 ` David Miller
2009-03-11 9:02 ` Rémi Denis-Courmont
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090310160040.GA93054@bts.sk \
--to=md@bts.sk \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=johnwheffner@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).