netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: andi@firstfloor.org, md@bts.sk, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: TCP rx window autotuning harmful at LAN context
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 16:01:49 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090311150149.GG11935@one.firstfloor.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090311.063058.236235660.davem@davemloft.net>

On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 06:30:58AM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
> Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 11:03:35 +0100
> 
> > Perhaps this points to the default buffer sizing heuristics to 
> > be too aggressive for >= 1GB?
> 
> It's necessary Andi, you can't fill a connection on a trans-
> continental connection without at least a 4MB receive buffer.

Seems pretty arbitary to me. It's the value for a given bandwidth*latency
product, but why not half or twice the bandwidth? I don't think
that number is written in stone like you claim.

Anyways it was just a test patch and it indeeds seems to address
the problem at least partly.

-Andi

-- 
ak@linux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only.

  reply	other threads:[~2009-03-11 14:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-03-09 11:25 TCP rx window autotuning harmful at LAN context Marian Ďurkovič
2009-03-09 18:01 ` John Heffner
2009-03-09 20:05   ` Marian Ďurkovič
2009-03-09 20:24     ` Stephen Hemminger
2009-03-10  0:09     ` David Miller
2009-03-10  0:34       ` Rick Jones
2009-03-10  3:55         ` John Heffner
2009-03-10 17:20           ` Rick Jones
2009-03-11 10:03       ` Andi Kleen
2009-03-11 11:03         ` Marian Ďurkovič
2009-03-11 13:30         ` David Miller
2009-03-11 15:01           ` Andi Kleen [this message]
2009-03-11 14:56             ` Marian Ďurkovič
2009-03-11 15:34             ` John Heffner
     [not found]   ` <20090309195906.M50328@bts.sk>
2009-03-09 20:23     ` John Heffner
2009-03-09 20:33       ` Stephen Hemminger
2009-03-09 23:52       ` David Miller
2009-03-10  0:09         ` John Heffner
2009-03-10  5:19           ` Eric Dumazet
     [not found]       ` <20090310104956.GA81181@bts.sk>
2009-03-10 11:30         ` David Miller
2009-03-10 11:46           ` Marian Ďurkovič
2009-03-10 15:23             ` John Heffner
2009-03-10 16:00               ` Marian Ďurkovič
2009-03-10 16:18                 ` David Miller
2009-03-11  8:29                   ` Marian Ďurkovič
2009-03-11  8:41                     ` David Miller
2009-03-11  9:05                       ` Marian Ďurkovič
2009-03-11  9:11                       ` Eric Dumazet
2009-03-11 13:25                         ` David Miller
2009-03-11  9:02 ` Rémi Denis-Courmont

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090311150149.GG11935@one.firstfloor.org \
    --to=andi@firstfloor.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=md@bts.sk \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).