* Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 12860] New: SO_RCVBUF and SO_SNDBUF must be set before connect() or listen()
[not found] <bug-12860-10286@http.bugzilla.kernel.org/>
@ 2009-03-12 20:13 ` Andrew Morton
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Andrew Morton @ 2009-03-12 20:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netdev; +Cc: bugme-daemon, cristiklein
(switched to email. Please respond via emailed reply-to-all, not via the
bugzilla web interface).
On Thu, 12 Mar 2009 10:23:52 -0700 (PDT)
bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org wrote:
> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12860
>
> Summary: SO_RCVBUF and SO_SNDBUF must be set before connect() or
> listen()
> Product: Networking
> Version: 2.5
> KernelVersion: 2.6.18
> Platform: All
> OS/Version: Linux
> Tree: Mainline
> Status: NEW
> Severity: normal
> Priority: P1
> Component: IPV4
> AssignedTo: shemminger@linux-foundation.org
> ReportedBy: cristiklein@gmail.com
>
>
> Problem Description:
>
> Calling setsockopt() with SO_RCVBUF or SO_SNDBUF after connect() or listen()
> makes sockets have a horrible performance. Moreover, getsockopt() returns
> values as if the previous setsockopt() was successful.
>
> Solution:
>
> 1) Document this somewhere in the man-pages (e.g. socket(7))
> 2) Make setsockopt() fail after connect() or listen()
>
> If you need an example code, I'll be happy to provide it.
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2009-03-12 20:14 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <bug-12860-10286@http.bugzilla.kernel.org/>
2009-03-12 20:13 ` [Bugme-new] [Bug 12860] New: SO_RCVBUF and SO_SNDBUF must be set before connect() or listen() Andrew Morton
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).