netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: paul.moore@hp.com
Cc: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, selinux@tycho.nsa.gov,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v1 1/3] lsm: Relocate the IPv4 security_inet_conn_request() hooks
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 11:54:58 -0700 (PDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090313.115458.168786837.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090312162256.29454.8929.stgit@flek.lan>

From: Paul Moore <paul.moore@hp.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 12:22:57 -0400

> The current placement of the security_inet_conn_request() hooks do not allow
> individual LSMs to override the IP options of the connection's request_sock.
> This is a problem as both SELinux and Smack have the ability to use labeled
> networking protocols which make use of IP options to carry security attributes
> and the inability to set the IP options at the start of the TCP handshake is
> problematic.
> 
> This patch moves the IPv4 security_inet_conn_request() hooks past the code
> where the request_sock's IP options are set/reset so that the LSM can safely
> manipulate the IP options as needed.  This patch intentionally does not change
> the related IPv6 hooks as IPv6 based labeling protocols which use IPv6 options
> are not currently implemented, once they are we will have a better idea of
> the correct placement for the IPv6 hooks.

This looks OK to me:

Acked-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

  reply	other threads:[~2009-03-13 18:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-03-12 16:22 [RFC PATCH v1 0/3] Fix a problem with incoming TCP connections and NetLabel Paul Moore
2009-03-12 16:22 ` [RFC PATCH v1 1/3] lsm: Relocate the IPv4 security_inet_conn_request() hooks Paul Moore
2009-03-13 18:54   ` David Miller [this message]
2009-03-13 19:39     ` Paul Moore
2009-03-12 16:23 ` [RFC PATCH v1 2/3] netlabel: Label incoming TCP connections correctly in SELinux Paul Moore
2009-03-12 16:23 ` [RFC PATCH v1 3/3] netlabel: Label incoming TCP connections correctly in Smack Paul Moore

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090313.115458.168786837.davem@davemloft.net \
    --to=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paul.moore@hp.com \
    --cc=selinux@tycho.nsa.gov \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).