From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: therbert@google.com
Cc: yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com, bhutchings@solarflare.com,
andi@firstfloor.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, herbert@gondor.apana.org.au,
jesse.brandeburg@intel.com, shemminger@vyatta.com
Subject: Re: [RFC v2: Patch 1/3] net: hand off skb list to other cpu to submit to upper layer
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 15:19:13 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090313.151913.21135937.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <65634d660903131459m645eb468y3ad850a1fd56d447@mail.gmail.com>
From: Tom Herbert <therbert@google.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 14:59:55 -0700
> I appreciate this philosophy, but unfortunately I don't have the
> luxury of working with a NIC that solves these problems. The reality
> may be that we're trying to squeeze performance out of crappy hardware
> to scale on multi-core. Left alone we couldn't get the stack to
> scale, but with these "destable hacks" we've gotten 3X or so
^^^^^^^^
Spelling.
> improvement in packets per second across both our dumb 1G and 10G
> NICs
Do these NICs at least support multiqueue?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-03-13 22:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-03-11 8:53 [RFC v2: Patch 1/3] net: hand off skb list to other cpu to submit to upper layer Zhang, Yanmin
2009-03-11 11:13 ` Andi Kleen
2009-03-12 8:16 ` Zhang, Yanmin
2009-03-12 14:08 ` Ben Hutchings
2009-03-13 6:43 ` Zhang, Yanmin
2009-03-13 17:06 ` Tom Herbert
2009-03-13 18:51 ` David Miller
2009-03-13 21:01 ` Tom Herbert
2009-03-13 22:10 ` Ben Hutchings
2009-03-13 22:15 ` Stephen Hemminger
[not found] ` <65634d660903131358h765bef64y6a0f1b0db7400f6f@mail.gmail.com>
2009-03-13 21:02 ` David Miller
2009-03-13 21:59 ` Tom Herbert
2009-03-13 22:19 ` David Miller [this message]
2009-03-13 23:58 ` Herbert Xu
2009-03-14 0:24 ` Tom Herbert
2009-03-14 1:53 ` Andi Kleen
2009-03-14 2:19 ` David Miller
2009-03-14 13:19 ` Herbert Xu
2009-03-14 18:15 ` Tom Herbert
2009-03-14 18:45 ` David Miller
2009-03-16 16:53 ` Tom Herbert
2009-03-14 1:51 ` Andi Kleen
2009-03-16 3:20 ` Zhang, Yanmin
2009-03-12 14:34 ` Andi Kleen
2009-03-13 9:06 ` Zhang, Yanmin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090313.151913.21135937.davem@davemloft.net \
--to=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=bhutchings@solarflare.com \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=jesse.brandeburg@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shemminger@vyatta.com \
--cc=therbert@google.com \
--cc=yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).