From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: jesper@krogh.cc
Cc: fubar@us.ibm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, jgarzik@redhat.com, aowi@novozymes.com
Subject: Re: Regression in bonding between 2.6.26.8 and 2.6.27.6 - bisected - twice
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 16:12:17 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090313.161217.52045656.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <49B581D3.6060807@krogh.cc>
From: Jesper Krogh <jesper@krogh.cc>
Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2009 21:53:39 +0100
> Jay Vosburgh wrote:
> > However, I did find another bug I introduced during the "mii
> > refactor" patch that you mentioned as being the original source of the
> > problem. That bug will cause 802.3ad to not notice speed changes.
> > Could you test the patch below on your 2.6.68.7 and/or 2.6.27.19
> > and see if it resolves your problem (without the forcedeth patch)?
>
> There was something missing from the header to make it compile.. I found that in a later version. Patch below fixed the problem (without the forcedeth patch).
Jay please resend this with proper signoffs etc. if you want
me to apply it.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-03-13 23:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-11-16 9:41 Regression in bonding between 2.6.26.8 and 2.6.27.6 Jesper Krogh
2008-11-17 23:45 ` Jay Vosburgh
2008-11-18 20:24 ` Jesper Krogh
2008-11-18 20:28 ` Jesper Krogh
2008-11-18 20:53 ` Jay Vosburgh
2008-11-19 7:53 ` Jesper Krogh
2008-12-08 20:42 ` Brandeburg, Jesse
2008-11-19 10:01 ` Jesper Krogh
2009-02-27 9:25 ` Regression in bonding between 2.6.26.8 and 2.6.27.6 - bisected Jesper Krogh
2009-02-27 16:28 ` Jay Vosburgh
2009-02-27 20:07 ` Jesper Krogh
2009-02-27 20:35 ` Jay Vosburgh
2009-02-28 17:21 ` Jesper Krogh
2009-03-01 6:21 ` Jesper Krogh
2009-03-01 13:19 ` Regression in bonding between 2.6.26.8 and 2.6.27.6 - bisected - twice Jesper Krogh
2009-03-05 18:51 ` Jay Vosburgh
2009-03-09 20:53 ` Jesper Krogh
2009-03-13 23:12 ` David Miller [this message]
2009-03-13 23:27 ` Jay Vosburgh
2009-03-16 20:34 ` Jesper Krogh
2009-03-16 20:35 ` David Miller
2009-03-17 20:18 ` Jesper Krogh
2009-03-19 1:39 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090313.161217.52045656.davem@davemloft.net \
--to=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=aowi@novozymes.com \
--cc=fubar@us.ibm.com \
--cc=jesper@krogh.cc \
--cc=jgarzik@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).