From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: Regression in bonding between 2.6.26.8 and 2.6.27.6 - bisected - twice Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 16:12:17 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20090313.161217.52045656.davem@davemloft.net> References: <49AA8B4F.8090405@krogh.cc> <9712.1236279072@death.nxdomain.ibm.com> <49B581D3.6060807@krogh.cc> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: fubar@us.ibm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, jgarzik@redhat.com, aowi@novozymes.com To: jesper@krogh.cc Return-path: Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:46450 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751998AbZCMXMb (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Mar 2009 19:12:31 -0400 In-Reply-To: <49B581D3.6060807@krogh.cc> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: Jesper Krogh Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2009 21:53:39 +0100 > Jay Vosburgh wrote: > > However, I did find another bug I introduced during the "mii > > refactor" patch that you mentioned as being the original source of the > > problem. That bug will cause 802.3ad to not notice speed changes. > > Could you test the patch below on your 2.6.68.7 and/or 2.6.27.19 > > and see if it resolves your problem (without the forcedeth patch)? > > There was something missing from the header to make it compile.. I found that in a later version. Patch below fixed the problem (without the forcedeth patch). Jay please resend this with proper signoffs etc. if you want me to apply it.