From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 12876] New: irq 18: nobody cared after down-ing an e1000 interface Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2009 14:30:58 -0700 Message-ID: <20090315143058.726ad8e9.akpm@linux-foundation.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: lkundrak@v3.sk, bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org To: e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: e1000-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org (switched to email. Please respond via emailed reply-to-all, not via the bugzilla web interface). On Sun, 15 Mar 2009 06:40:54 -0700 (PDT) bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org wrote: > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12876 > > Summary: irq 18: nobody cared after down-ing an e1000 interface > Product: Drivers > Version: 2.5 > KernelVersion: 2.6.29-0.237.rc7.git4.fc11.i586 > Platform: All > OS/Version: Linux > Tree: Mainline > Status: NEW > Severity: normal > Priority: P1 > Component: Network > AssignedTo: drivers_network@kernel-bugs.osdl.org > ReportedBy: lkundrak@v3.sk > > > Distribution: Fedora > Hardware Environment: > http://smolts.org/show?uuid=pub_63f33868-db84-4452-bb6d-eeb440ee5449 > > Problem Description: > > I get the following OOPS when I down the e1000 network interface: > > irq 18: nobody cared (try booting with the "irqpoll" option) > Pid: 9014, comm: udevd Tainted: G W 2.6.29-0.237.rc7.git4.fc11.i586 #1 > Call Trace: > [] __report_bad_irq+0x33/0x74 > [] note_interrupt+0xf2/0x150 > [] ? handle_IRQ_event+0x4f/0x58 > [] handle_fasteoi_irq+0x94/0xb7 > [] ? handle_fasteoi_irq+0x0/0xb7 > [] ? common_interrupt+0x2c/0x40 > handlers: > [] (ata_sff_interrupt+0x0/0xb1) > [] (usb_hcd_irq+0x0/0xa3) > Disabling IRQ #18 > > As you can see, the IRQ 18 is shared with ata_sff and usb_hcd. > > I've tried to comment out e1000_free_irq() call from e1000_close() and added a > printk() to e1000_intr(). After that, the problem didn't occur, but I've not > seen the output of the printk in e1000_intr() (It was visible while the > interface was up), as if it weren't called. Seems like the way shared > interrupts work is beyond my understanding. > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Apps built with the Adobe(R) Flex(R) framework and Flex Builder(TM) are powering Web 2.0 with engaging, cross-platform capabilities. Quickly and easily build your RIAs with Flex Builder, the Eclipse(TM)based development software that enables intelligent coding and step-through debugging. Download the free 60 day trial. http://p.sf.net/sfu/www-adobe-com