From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: pull request: wireless-2.6 2009-03-16 Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 14:39:49 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20090317.143949.250643299.davem@davemloft.net> References: <20090316231423.GA3633@tuxdriver.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, sfr@canb.auug.org.au To: linville@tuxdriver.com Return-path: Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:34070 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754589AbZCQVkD (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Mar 2009 17:40:03 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20090316231423.GA3633@tuxdriver.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: "John W. Linville" Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 19:14:24 -0400 > Here is a group of patches intended for 2.6.29. The one from me is > minor, but it cuts-down on log SPAM for ipw2100, ipw2200, and hostap > users. The two from Jouni fix some panics he observed himself. > > The first one from Luis fixes bug 12110 at bugzilla.kernel.org. I know > he has worked on it for a long time and I've had several desperate users > asking for it, so it must be good. :-) Unfortunately, it causes some > nasty merge errors with what is in net-next-2.6 and wireless-next-2.6. > I created a merge-test branch in wireless-next-2.6, and the merge commit > log goes into more detail about resolving the issue. In short, you > probably want to diff drivers/net/ath9k against the merge-test branch... > > Please let me know if there are problems! Pulled, thanks John. Wish me luck with the net-next-2.6 merge :-)