From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCHv3] netns: oops in ip[6]_frag_reasm incrementing stats Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 23:26:51 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20090318.232651.99085030.davem@davemloft.net> References: <49BFAB7C.1020503@dti2.net> <20090318072658.GA4799@ff.dom.local> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: jorge@dti2.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: jarkao2@gmail.com Return-path: Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:42203 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752860AbZCSG1F convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Mar 2009 02:27:05 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20090318072658.GA4799@ff.dom.local> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: =46rom: Jarek Poplawski Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 07:26:58 +0000 > On 17-03-2009 14:54, Jorge Boncompte [DTI2] wrote: > > Jarek Poplawski escribi=F3: > >> On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 12:55:42PM +0100, Jorge Boncompte [DTI2] w= rote: > >>> dev can be NULL in ip[6]_frag_reasm for skb's coming from RAW soc= kets. > >>> > >>> Quagga's OSPFD sends fragmented packets on a RAW socket, when net= filter > >>> conntrack reassembles them on the OUTPUT path you hit this code p= ath. > >>> > >>> You can test it with something like "hping2 -0 -d 2000 -f AA.BB.C= C.DD" > >>> > >>> Changes from v2: (address comments from Jarek Poplawski) > >>> - Patch reworked to get the net pointer with container_of() > >>> instead of passing it to function calls. > >>> - Fix IPv6 code > >>> Changes from v1: > >>> - Fixed description > >> I guess David will be interested only with the final state of chan= ges, > >> so v1 & v2 are not necessary here... > >> > >> Anyway, ipv4 looks OK to me, but ipv6 looks like something is > >> different: > >>> + IP6_INC_STATS_BH(net, __in6_dev_get(dev), IPSTATS_MIB_REASMFAIL= S); > >> It still depends on dev !=3D NULL in __in6_dev_get(). I see there > >> is also used skb->dst for similar things in ip6_frag_queue(), so I > >> don't know: it needs rethinking, and maybe these patches should be > >> separated if you prefer. > >=20 > > Not my day! :-) I should not look at code at 2 am and write patche= s > > the day after, I confused _idev and idev in the check for !=3D NULL= in _DEVINC. > >=20 > > I think this bug was first introduced by patch "[IPV6]: Per-interf= ace > > statistics support." from YOSHIFUJI Hideaki on Nov 4, 2006. > >=20 > > If someone with more knowledge could confirm that using something = like... > >=20 > > "(skb->dev ? skb->dev : skb->dst->dev)" > >=20 > > ... here is fine I'll redo this part and resend. I do not have an I= Pv6 setup where > > I can test this. > >=20 >=20 > skb->dst->dev is used in ip6_frag_queue anyway, so it shouldn't be > worse if you do this similarly in ip6_frag_reasm. If you send it as > a separate patch, and write it's not tested, David will decide if he > wants it. Otherwise you can resend this ipv4 patch only. Netfilter on ipv6 handles reassembly differently and in a way that won't result in dev being NULL here. I've applied Jorge's patch, thanks everyone.