From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@vyatta.com>
To: Jiri Pirko <jpirko@redhat.com>
Cc: "Bjørn Mork" <bjorn@mork.no>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH]: sunvnet netdev ops conversion...
Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2009 09:16:18 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090320091618.2604ad53@nehalam> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090320141949.GA1031@psychotron.englab.brq.redhat.com>
On Fri, 20 Mar 2009 15:19:50 +0100
Jiri Pirko <jpirko@redhat.com> wrote:
> Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 12:43:00PM CET, bjorn@mork.no wrote:
> >David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> writes:
> >> From: Yang Hongyang <yanghy@cn.fujitsu.com>
> >> Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2009 16:30:59 +0800
> >>
> >>> David Miller wrote:
> >>> > Committed to net-next-2.6...
> >>> >
> >>> > sunvnet: Convert to net_device_ops.
> >>>
> >>> I noticed that there are other drivers's net_device_ops
> >>> need to be converted,is these convert nessary?
> >>
> >> Not necessary, but desirable. Once all drivers are
> >> converted we can remove the compatability code.
> >
> >Just thinking... Would it make sense, at some point before removing the
> >compatibility layer, to add tests for partial conversions? I noticed
> >the sungem bug just fixed by Stephen Hemminger
> >( http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.network/122756 )
> >which could have been caught by the patch below.
> >
> >This will also ease the transition of "driver sets", like usbnet and
> >it's children, where a number of drivers need to make the conversion
> >together. Don't know if that's a big problem, but it did stop my first
> >attempt to convert usbnet because I was uncertain whether I had caught
> >all of the necessary mini driver conversions.
> >
> >Signed-off-by: Bjørn Mork <bjorn@mork.no>
> >---
I intend to get all drivers in x86 allmodconfig converted, then
change expose the COMPAT_NETDEV_OPS as a config option (which is how
I test). Need to wait until after in tree drivers all converted
because kernel developers expect random configurations to build.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-03-20 16:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-03-20 7:52 [PATCH]: sunvnet netdev ops conversion David Miller
2009-03-20 8:30 ` Yang Hongyang
2009-03-20 8:34 ` David Miller
2009-03-20 11:43 ` Bjørn Mork
2009-03-20 14:19 ` Jiri Pirko
2009-03-20 16:16 ` Stephen Hemminger [this message]
2009-03-20 22:54 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090320091618.2604ad53@nehalam \
--to=shemminger@vyatta.com \
--cc=bjorn@mork.no \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=jpirko@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).