From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Subject: Re: [PATCH] pci: fix kexec with power state D3 Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2009 12:29:16 +0100 Message-ID: <200903201229.18962.rjw@sisk.pl> References: <49B1F934.5050006@kernel.org> <20090308110835.GB27811@elte.hu> <20090319184948.44bf5e9a@hobbes.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Ingo Molnar , Yinghai Lu , Andrew Morton , Matthew Wilcox , Jesse Brandeburg , David Miller , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , NetDev , linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, pm list To: Jesse Barnes Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20090319184948.44bf5e9a@hobbes.lan> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Friday 20 March 2009, Jesse Barnes wrote: > > > And, quite frankly, I'm not sure if users will be happy with > > > the $subject patch, because it _really_ breaks things (well, > > > the kexec users who don't use suspend might be, but surely > > > suspend users who don't use kexec won't). > > > > Please note that i havent reviewed the patches and i did not > > take any sides in the discussion - i just flagged the maintainer > > ping-pong. As long as we pick one of the patches (or a third > > one) within a bound amount of time we should be fine :) > > I'll defer to Rafael here; he's been working the most in this area. > The changelog wasn't very complete for the original patch, but it > sounds like in the kexec case the newly booted kernel will get an igb > device in D3 which it can't handle? That really does sound like a > driver bug, not something we should mess with in the core. I have already posted an alternative patch for igb that's been reported to fix the problem. Thanks, Rafael