From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net/bridge: use the maximum hard_header_len of ports
 for bridging device
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 01:16:16 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <20090323.011616.46450004.davem@davemloft.net>
References: <2a27d3730903230059s5f6aa886k30515bd6429a1e71@mail.gmail.com>
	<20090323.010247.82335962.davem@davemloft.net>
	<2a27d3730903230115r52fb73f0q87c496eda19ba88c@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: shemminger@linux-foundation.org, bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org
To: leoli@freescale.com
Return-path: <netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:51911
	"EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-OK)
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754552AbZCWIQ3 (ORCPT
	<rfc822;netdev@vger.kernel.org>); Mon, 23 Mar 2009 04:16:29 -0400
In-Reply-To: <2a27d3730903230115r52fb73f0q87c496eda19ba88c@mail.gmail.com>
Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <netdev.vger.kernel.org>

From: Li Yang <leoli@freescale.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 16:15:34 +0800

> I was wondering if this one failed to get your attention.

yeah, happens all the time