From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jarek Poplawski Subject: Re: [PATCH] netconsole: fix BUG during net device "upping" Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 08:11:58 +0000 Message-ID: <20090323081158.GB4976@ff.dom.local> References: <20090322.212107.55546529.davem@davemloft.net> <20090323080455.GA4976@ff.dom.local> <20090323.010541.94308473.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: mpm@selenic.com, marcin.slusarz@gmail.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, k-keiichi@bx.jp.nec.com, stable@kernel.org, rjw@sisk.pl, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org To: David Miller Return-path: Received: from mail-ew0-f165.google.com ([209.85.219.165]:59021 "EHLO mail-ew0-f165.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755311AbZCWIMF (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Mar 2009 04:12:05 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090323.010541.94308473.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 01:05:41AM -0700, David Miller wrote: > From: Jarek Poplawski > Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 08:04:55 +0000 > > > What is the rationale of this decision? printk is a basic tool, > > especially designed to work in as many places as possible, and > > netconsole is rather something secondary (sorry Matt)?! > > And this basic tool cannot work from the drivers ->open() method. And in any function used in the drivers ->open(). BTW, with Marcin's patch it can... Jarek P.