From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Paul E. McKenney" Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] Doc: Fix missing whitespaces in RCU documentation. Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2009 15:48:24 -0700 Message-ID: <20090329224824.GG11362@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <20090329215103.27553.29216.stgit@localhost.localdomain> <20090329215247.27553.67635.stgit@localhost.localdomain> Reply-To: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: David Miller , netdev@vger.kernel.org To: Jesper Dangaard Brouer Return-path: Received: from e3.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.143]:60718 "EHLO e3.ny.us.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751909AbZC2Ws1 (ORCPT ); Sun, 29 Mar 2009 18:48:27 -0400 Received: from d01relay02.pok.ibm.com (d01relay02.pok.ibm.com [9.56.227.234]) by e3.ny.us.ibm.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n2TMjDt2007910 for ; Sun, 29 Mar 2009 18:45:13 -0400 Received: from d01av04.pok.ibm.com (d01av04.pok.ibm.com [9.56.224.64]) by d01relay02.pok.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v9.2) with ESMTP id n2TMmPUs188150 for ; Sun, 29 Mar 2009 18:48:25 -0400 Received: from d01av04.pok.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d01av04.pok.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id n2TMmO8Q026704 for ; Sun, 29 Mar 2009 18:48:25 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090329215247.27553.67635.stgit@localhost.localdomain> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 11:52:47PM +0200, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote: > Trivial fix while reading through the RCU docs. > > Reviewed-by: Paul E. McKenney I could have sworn that this was somewhere in the process, but cannot find it. So... Reviewed-by: Paul E. McKenney > Signed-off-by: Jesper Dangaard Brouer > --- > > Documentation/RCU/rcu.txt | 2 +- > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/RCU/rcu.txt b/Documentation/RCU/rcu.txt > index 95821a2..7aa2002 100644 > --- a/Documentation/RCU/rcu.txt > +++ b/Documentation/RCU/rcu.txt > @@ -81,7 +81,7 @@ o I hear that RCU needs work in order to support realtime kernels? > This work is largely completed. Realtime-friendly RCU can be > enabled via the CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU kernel configuration parameter. > However, work is in progress for enabling priority boosting of > - preempted RCU read-side critical sections.This is needed if you > + preempted RCU read-side critical sections. This is needed if you > have CPU-bound realtime threads. > > o Where can I find more information on RCU? >