From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Chris Wright <chrisw@sous-sol.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 00/17] virtual-bus
Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 14:28:30 -0700
Message-ID: <20090401212830.GT18394@sequoia.sous-sol.org>
References: <20090331184057.28333.77287.stgit@dev.haskins.net> <87ab71monw.fsf@basil.nowhere.org> <49D35825.3050001@novell.com> <20090401132340.GT11935@one.firstfloor.org> <49D37805.1060301@novell.com> <20090401170103.GU11935@one.firstfloor.org> <49D3B64F.6070703@codemonkey.ws> <20090401204039.GR18394@sequoia.sous-sol.org> <49D3D88E.3090009@novell.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: Chris Wright <chrisw@sous-sol.org>,
	Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>,
	Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	agraf@suse.de, pmullaney@novell.com, pmorreale@novell.com,
	rusty@rustcorp.com.au, netdev@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org
To: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@novell.com>
Return-path: <kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <49D3D88E.3090009@novell.com>
Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org

* Gregory Haskins (ghaskins@novell.com) wrote:
> Note that the design of vbus should prevent any weakening

Could you elaborate?