From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com>
Cc: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>,
linux kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Netdev List <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] percpu: convert SNMP mibs to new infra
Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2009 19:10:24 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090403171024.GG19982@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <49D4724C.7010200@cosmosbay.com>
* Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com> wrote:
> Ingo Molnar a écrit :
> > * Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Hello, Eric, Ingo.
> >>
> >> Eric Dumazet wrote:
> >>> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/percpu.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/percpu.h
> >>> index aee103b..6b82f6b 100644
> >>> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/percpu.h
> >>> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/percpu.h
> >>> @@ -135,6 +135,9 @@ do { \
> >>> #define percpu_read(var) percpu_from_op("mov", per_cpu__##var)
> >>> #define percpu_write(var, val) percpu_to_op("mov", per_cpu__##var, val)
> >>> #define percpu_add(var, val) percpu_to_op("add", per_cpu__##var, val)
> >>> +#define indir_percpu_add(var, val) percpu_to_op("add", *(var), val)
> >>> +#define indir_percpu_inc(var) percpu_to_op("add", *(var), 1)
> >>> +#define indir_percpu_dec(var) percpu_to_op("add", *(var), -1)
> >>> #define percpu_sub(var, val) percpu_to_op("sub", per_cpu__##var, val)
> >>> #define percpu_and(var, val) percpu_to_op("and", per_cpu__##var, val)
> >>> #define percpu_or(var, val) percpu_to_op("or", per_cpu__##var, val)
> >> The final goal is to unify static and dynamic accesses but we
> >> aren't there yet, so, for the time being, we'll need some interim
> >> solutions. I would prefer percpu_ptr_add() tho.
> >
> > Yep, that's the standard naming scheme for new APIs: generic to
> > specific, left to right.
> >
>
> Here is a second version of the patch, with percpu_ptr_xxx convention,
> and more polished form (snmp_mib_free() was forgoten in previous RFC)
>
> Thank you all
>
> [PATCH] percpu: convert SNMP mibs to new infra
>
> Some arches can use percpu infrastructure for safe changes to mibs.
> (percpu_add() is safe against preemption and interrupts), but
> we want the real thing (a single instruction), not an emulation.
>
> On arches still using an emulation, its better to keep the two views
> per mib and preemption disable/enable
>
> This shrinks size of mibs by 50%, but also shrinks vmlinux text size
> (minimum IPV4 config)
>
> $ size vmlinux.old vmlinux.new
> text data bss dec hex filename
> 4308458 561092 1728512 6598062 64adae vmlinux.old
> 4303834 561092 1728512 6593438 649b9e vmlinux.new
Wow, that's pretty impressive!
> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/include/asm/percpu.h | 3 +++
Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
As far as x86 goes, feel free to pick it up into any of the
networking trees, these bits are easily merged and it's probably
best if the patch stays in a single piece - it looks compact enough
and if it breaks it's going to break in networking code.
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-04-03 17:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-04-01 8:13 [PATCH] x86: percpu_to_op() misses memory and flags clobbers Eric Dumazet
2009-04-01 9:02 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-04-01 10:14 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-04-01 16:12 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-04-01 16:41 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-04-01 16:44 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-04-01 17:13 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-04-01 18:07 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-04-01 18:47 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-04-02 9:52 ` Herbert Xu
2009-04-02 14:12 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-04-01 18:44 ` [RFC] percpu: convert SNMP mibs to new infra Eric Dumazet
2009-04-02 0:13 ` Tejun Heo
2009-04-02 4:05 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-04-02 8:07 ` [PATCH] " Eric Dumazet
2009-04-03 0:39 ` Tejun Heo
2009-04-03 17:10 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2009-04-02 5:04 ` [RFC] " Rusty Russell
2009-04-02 5:19 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-04-02 11:46 ` Rusty Russell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090403171024.GG19982@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=dada1@cosmosbay.com \
--cc=htejun@gmail.com \
--cc=jeremy@goop.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).