From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
To: davem@davemloft.net
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>,
netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: netfilter 03/03: ctnetlink: fix regression in expectation handling
Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 18:52:19 +0200 (MEST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090408165216.6702.57294.sendpatchset@x2.localnet> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090408165212.6702.44171.sendpatchset@x2.localnet>
commit 83731671d9e6878c0a05d309c68fb71c16d3235a
Author: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
Date: Mon Apr 6 17:47:20 2009 +0200
netfilter: ctnetlink: fix regression in expectation handling
This patch fixes a regression (introduced by myself in commit 19abb7b:
netfilter: ctnetlink: deliver events for conntracks changed from
userspace) that results in an expectation re-insertion since
__nf_ct_expect_check() may return 0 for expectation timer refreshing.
This patch also removes a unnecessary refcount bump that
pretended to avoid a possible race condition with event delivery
and expectation timers (as said, not needed since we hold a
reference to the object since until we finish the expectation
setup). This also merges nf_ct_expect_related_report() and
nf_ct_expect_related() which look basically the same.
Reported-by: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
Signed-off-by: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
diff --git a/include/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_expect.h b/include/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_expect.h
index ab17a15..a965280 100644
--- a/include/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_expect.h
+++ b/include/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_expect.h
@@ -99,9 +99,12 @@ void nf_ct_expect_init(struct nf_conntrack_expect *, unsigned int, u_int8_t,
const union nf_inet_addr *,
u_int8_t, const __be16 *, const __be16 *);
void nf_ct_expect_put(struct nf_conntrack_expect *exp);
-int nf_ct_expect_related(struct nf_conntrack_expect *expect);
int nf_ct_expect_related_report(struct nf_conntrack_expect *expect,
u32 pid, int report);
+static inline int nf_ct_expect_related(struct nf_conntrack_expect *expect)
+{
+ return nf_ct_expect_related_report(expect, 0, 0);
+}
#endif /*_NF_CONNTRACK_EXPECT_H*/
diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_expect.c b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_expect.c
index 3940f99..afde8f9 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_expect.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_expect.c
@@ -372,7 +372,7 @@ static inline int __nf_ct_expect_check(struct nf_conntrack_expect *expect)
struct net *net = nf_ct_exp_net(expect);
struct hlist_node *n;
unsigned int h;
- int ret = 0;
+ int ret = 1;
if (!master_help->helper) {
ret = -ESHUTDOWN;
@@ -412,41 +412,23 @@ out:
return ret;
}
-int nf_ct_expect_related(struct nf_conntrack_expect *expect)
+int nf_ct_expect_related_report(struct nf_conntrack_expect *expect,
+ u32 pid, int report)
{
int ret;
spin_lock_bh(&nf_conntrack_lock);
ret = __nf_ct_expect_check(expect);
- if (ret < 0)
+ if (ret <= 0)
goto out;
+ ret = 0;
nf_ct_expect_insert(expect);
- atomic_inc(&expect->use);
- spin_unlock_bh(&nf_conntrack_lock);
- nf_ct_expect_event(IPEXP_NEW, expect);
- nf_ct_expect_put(expect);
- return ret;
-out:
spin_unlock_bh(&nf_conntrack_lock);
+ nf_ct_expect_event_report(IPEXP_NEW, expect, pid, report);
return ret;
-}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(nf_ct_expect_related);
-
-int nf_ct_expect_related_report(struct nf_conntrack_expect *expect,
- u32 pid, int report)
-{
- int ret;
-
- spin_lock_bh(&nf_conntrack_lock);
- ret = __nf_ct_expect_check(expect);
- if (ret < 0)
- goto out;
- nf_ct_expect_insert(expect);
out:
spin_unlock_bh(&nf_conntrack_lock);
- if (ret == 0)
- nf_ct_expect_event_report(IPEXP_NEW, expect, pid, report);
return ret;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(nf_ct_expect_related_report);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-04-08 16:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-04-08 16:52 netfilter 00/03: netfilter fixes Patrick McHardy
2009-04-08 16:52 ` netfilter 01/03: ip6tables regression fix Patrick McHardy
2009-04-08 16:52 ` netfilter 02/03: fix selection of "LED" target in netfilter Patrick McHardy
2009-04-08 16:52 ` Patrick McHardy [this message]
2009-04-08 20:43 ` netfilter 00/03: netfilter fixes David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090408165216.6702.57294.sendpatchset@x2.localnet \
--to=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox