From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Robin Getz Subject: Re: IRQF_SAMPLE_RANDOM question... Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 20:41:29 -0400 Message-ID: <200904092041.29248.rgetz@blackfin.uclinux.org> References: <200904061430.26276.rgetz@blackfin.uclinux.org> <200904090954.54601.rgetz@blackfin.uclinux.org> <1239296459.31467.142.camel@calx> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Chris Peterson" To: "Matt Mackall" Return-path: Received: from nwd2mail10.analog.com ([137.71.25.55]:18993 "EHLO nwd2mail10.analog.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753448AbZDJAjw (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Apr 2009 20:39:52 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1239296459.31467.142.camel@calx> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu 9 Apr 2009 13:00, Matt Mackall pondered: > On Thu, 2009-04-09 at 09:54 -0400, Robin Getz wrote: > > On Wed 8 Apr 2009 15:51, Matt Mackall pondered: > > > On Tue, 2009-04-07 at 17:44 -0400, Robin Getz wrote: > > > > Is that "Everything in general, with a few exceptions", or > > > > "__Everything__"? > > > > > > Everything. We want every input point to better document the type of > > > entropy source. > > > > OK - any objections to something like this? > > Hmm, this is a purely internal interface. Not sure if we need to bother > with scheduling it. My plan was to simply get the new code in and sweep > the kernel. Yeah - it just stops people from putting in more places you need to change later.