From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: 2.6.29 ALB bonding printk()s every arp Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 16:43:40 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20090414.164340.06293708.davem@davemloft.net> References: <1225849876-8930-2-git-send-email-fubar@us.ibm.com> <1225849876-8930-3-git-send-email-fubar@us.ibm.com> <49E518F8.3030109@siriusit.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: fubar@us.ibm.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, jgarzik@pobox.com To: duncan.gibb@siriusit.co.uk Return-path: Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:45987 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752123AbZDNXns (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Apr 2009 19:43:48 -0400 In-Reply-To: <49E518F8.3030109@siriusit.co.uk> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: Duncan Gibb Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 00:15:04 +0100 > On 05 Nov 2008 at 01:51, Jay Vosburgh wrote: >> if (arp->op_code == htons(ARPOP_REPLY)) { >> /* update rx hash table for this ARP */ >> + printk("rar: update orig %s bond_dev %s\n", orig_dev->name, >> + bond_dev->name); >> + bond = bond_dev->priv; >> rlb_update_entry_from_arp(bond, arp); >> dprintk("Server received an ARP Reply from client\n"); >> } > > Is the printk() in this patch necessary? > > We recently put a 2.6.29 kernel on a router with multiple ALB bonds each > of several e1000 devices. It now generates a log entry every time an > arp is-at packet arrives at a bonded interface. I'm not sure that's a > feature... That's pretty annoying. Jay can we just remove this?