From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alex Sidorenko Subject: Re: An inconsistency/bug in ingress netem timestamps Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 17:00:59 -0400 Message-ID: <200904151700.59906.alexandre.sidorenko@hp.com> References: <20090415195022.GA3322@ami.dom.local> <20090415202620.GB3322@ami.dom.local> <20090415132918.7579ffa6@nehalam> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Jarek Poplawski , "netdev@vger.kernel.org" To: Stephen Hemminger Return-path: Received: from g1t0026.austin.hp.com ([15.216.28.33]:33485 "EHLO g1t0026.austin.hp.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753374AbZDOVBD (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Apr 2009 17:01:03 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20090415132918.7579ffa6@nehalam> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On April 15, 2009 04:29:18 pm Stephen Hemminger wrote: > As long as it is consistent, then I have no problem > with the existing behavior; ie. it is not a bug, it just works that way. Hi Stephen, the timestamps change depending on whether there are any ptype_all handlers registered. Just starting tcpdump changes the behaviour, this probably means 'inconsistent' ? Regards, Alex -- ------------------------------------------------------------------ Alexandre Sidorenko email: asid@hp.com WTEC Linux Hewlett-Packard (Canada) ------------------------------------------------------------------