From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: cl@linux.com
Cc: bhutchings@solarflare.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Network latency regressions from 2.6.22 to 2.6.29
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 15:47:52 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090416.154752.185818977.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.1.10.0904161500020.15835@qirst.com>
From: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 15:02:36 -0400 (EDT)
> On Thu, 16 Apr 2009, Ben Hutchings wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 2009-04-16 at 12:10 -0400, Christoph Lameter wrote:
>> > The following are results of lantency measurements using udpping
>> > (available from http://gentwo.org/ll). It shows that significant latencies
>> > were added since 2.6.27. I surely wish we could get back to times below 90
>> > microseconds.
>> [...]
>>
>> This "90 microseconds" figure is specific to a particular driver and
>> hardware. Have you verified that it applies to others? The variation
>> you've reported is tiny compared to the improvements that can be made or
>> lost by hardware tuning.
>
> The RX delay can influence this of course and so can the driver. But the
> measurements are with the same RX delay and the same driver. Variations
> are up to 20% which is not tiny and its only due to different kernel
> versions.
The driver is changing, and that can also be enough.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-04-16 22:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-04-16 16:10 Network latency regressions from 2.6.22 to 2.6.29 Christoph Lameter
2009-04-16 17:21 ` Rick Jones
2009-04-16 19:06 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-04-16 19:29 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-04-16 19:33 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-04-16 22:47 ` David Miller
2009-04-17 13:46 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-04-17 21:43 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2009-04-16 20:05 ` Rick Jones
2009-04-16 18:07 ` Ben Hutchings
2009-04-16 19:02 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-04-16 21:19 ` Ben Hutchings
2009-04-16 22:47 ` David Miller [this message]
2009-04-16 19:43 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-04-16 19:50 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-04-16 20:01 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-04-16 23:00 ` David Miller
2009-04-17 16:42 ` Network latency regressions from 2.6.22 to 2.6.29 (results with IRQ affinity) Christoph Lameter
2009-04-18 8:18 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-04-18 8:20 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-04-18 19:43 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-04-20 17:29 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-04-20 17:57 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-04-20 18:13 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-04-20 18:46 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-04-20 19:16 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-04-20 20:07 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-04-20 21:14 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-04-20 21:52 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-04-21 14:00 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-04-21 19:36 ` Network latency regressions from 2.6.22 to 2.6.29 (MSI off) Christoph Lameter
2009-04-20 19:44 ` Network latency regressions from 2.6.22 to 2.6.29 (results with IRQ affinity) Evgeniy Polyakov
2009-04-16 19:55 ` Network latency regressions from 2.6.22 to 2.6.29 Christoph Lameter
2009-04-16 21:57 ` Michael Chan
2009-04-17 13:47 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-04-16 22:59 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090416.154752.185818977.davem@davemloft.net \
--to=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=bhutchings@solarflare.com \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).