netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Re: [PATCH] tun: fix BUG with large packets without TUN_VNET_HDR
       [not found] <20090416204556.GA5846@dhcp-1-124.tlv.redhat.com>
@ 2009-04-16 20:56 ` Stephen Hemminger
  2009-04-16 21:05   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
  2009-04-16 23:50 ` Herbert Xu
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Hemminger @ 2009-04-16 20:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Michael S. Tsirkin
  Cc: mst, Herbert Xu, David S. Miller, netdev, Rusty Russell,
	Max Krasnyansky, Rafael J. Wysocki

On Thu, 16 Apr 2009 23:45:57 +0300
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> wrote:

> On a tap device, the linear part of skb must be at least ETH_HLEN,
> otherwise eth_type_trans triggers BUG_ON in skb_pull(skb, ETH_HLEN).
> This patch makes sure the linear part is always large enough.
> 
> Without the patch, tun sets the linear part size to 0 if TUN_VNET_HDR
> is not set and the packet is too large to put in a linear skb,
> which causes BUGs for me.
> 
> BTW, it seems that this behaviour has been there for a long while, since at
> least v2.6.27 (commit f42157cb568c1eb02eca7df4da67553a9edae24a: tun: fallback
> if skb_alloc() fails on big packets), but started triggering for me only in
> v2.6.30-rc1, because of commit 33dccbb050bbe35b88ca8cf1228dcf3e4d4b3554 (tun:
> Limit amount of queued packets per device), which made all large packets
> non-linear.  Before that, most packets would still typically be linear until
> memory gets fragmented, which hides the issue.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
> ---

Why not just use pskb_may_pull?

--- a/drivers/net/tun.c	2009-04-16 13:52:00.178013518 -0700
+++ b/drivers/net/tun.c	2009-04-16 13:55:47.227752328 -0700
@@ -595,6 +595,9 @@ static __inline__ ssize_t tun_get_user(s
 
 	switch (tun->flags & TUN_TYPE_MASK) {
 	case TUN_TUN_DEV:
+		if (!pskb_may_pull(skb, 1))
+			goto drop;
+
 		if (tun->flags & TUN_NO_PI) {
 			switch (skb->data[0] & 0xf0) {
 			case 0x40:
@@ -604,6 +607,7 @@ static __inline__ ssize_t tun_get_user(s
 				pi.proto = htons(ETH_P_IPV6);
 				break;
 			default:
+			drop:
 				tun->dev->stats.rx_dropped++;
 				kfree_skb(skb);
 				return -EINVAL;
@@ -615,6 +619,9 @@ static __inline__ ssize_t tun_get_user(s
 		skb->dev = tun->dev;
 		break;
 	case TUN_TAP_DEV:
+		if (!pskb_may_pull(skb, ETH_HLEN))
+			goto drop;
+
 		skb->protocol = eth_type_trans(skb, tun->dev);
 		break;
 	};

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] tun: fix BUG with large packets without TUN_VNET_HDR
  2009-04-16 20:56 ` [PATCH] tun: fix BUG with large packets without TUN_VNET_HDR Stephen Hemminger
@ 2009-04-16 21:05   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Michael S. Tsirkin @ 2009-04-16 21:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Stephen Hemminger
  Cc: mst, Herbert Xu, David S. Miller, netdev, Rusty Russell,
	Max Krasnyansky, Rafael J. Wysocki

On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 01:56:52PM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Apr 2009 23:45:57 +0300
> "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> wrote:
> 
> > On a tap device, the linear part of skb must be at least ETH_HLEN,
> > otherwise eth_type_trans triggers BUG_ON in skb_pull(skb, ETH_HLEN).
> > This patch makes sure the linear part is always large enough.
> > 
> > Without the patch, tun sets the linear part size to 0 if TUN_VNET_HDR
> > is not set and the packet is too large to put in a linear skb,
> > which causes BUGs for me.
> > 
> > BTW, it seems that this behaviour has been there for a long while, since at
> > least v2.6.27 (commit f42157cb568c1eb02eca7df4da67553a9edae24a: tun: fallback
> > if skb_alloc() fails on big packets), but started triggering for me only in
> > v2.6.30-rc1, because of commit 33dccbb050bbe35b88ca8cf1228dcf3e4d4b3554 (tun:
> > Limit amount of queued packets per device), which made all large packets
> > non-linear.  Before that, most packets would still typically be linear until
> > memory gets fragmented, which hides the issue.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
> > ---
> 
> Why not just use pskb_may_pull?
> 
> --- a/drivers/net/tun.c	2009-04-16 13:52:00.178013518 -0700
> +++ b/drivers/net/tun.c	2009-04-16 13:55:47.227752328 -0700
> @@ -595,6 +595,9 @@ static __inline__ ssize_t tun_get_user(s
>  
>  	switch (tun->flags & TUN_TYPE_MASK) {
>  	case TUN_TUN_DEV:
> +		if (!pskb_may_pull(skb, 1))
> +			goto drop;
> +
>  		if (tun->flags & TUN_NO_PI) {
>  			switch (skb->data[0] & 0xf0) {
>  			case 0x40:
> @@ -604,6 +607,7 @@ static __inline__ ssize_t tun_get_user(s
>  				pi.proto = htons(ETH_P_IPV6);
>  				break;
>  			default:
> +			drop:
>  				tun->dev->stats.rx_dropped++;
>  				kfree_skb(skb);
>  				return -EINVAL;
> @@ -615,6 +619,9 @@ static __inline__ ssize_t tun_get_user(s
>  		skb->dev = tun->dev;
>  		break;
>  	case TUN_TAP_DEV:
> +		if (!pskb_may_pull(skb, ETH_HLEN))
> +			goto drop;
> +
>  		skb->protocol = eth_type_trans(skb, tun->dev);
>  		break;
>  	};

It seems that this would drop all packets which are larger than 1 page
if the device has TUN_VNET_HDR off. No? What am I missing?
-- 
MST

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] tun: fix BUG with large packets without TUN_VNET_HDR
       [not found] <20090416204556.GA5846@dhcp-1-124.tlv.redhat.com>
  2009-04-16 20:56 ` [PATCH] tun: fix BUG with large packets without TUN_VNET_HDR Stephen Hemminger
@ 2009-04-16 23:50 ` Herbert Xu
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Herbert Xu @ 2009-04-16 23:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Michael S. Tsirkin
  Cc: David S. Miller, netdev, Rusty Russell, Max Krasnyansky,
	Rafael J. Wysocki

On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 11:45:57PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On a tap device, the linear part of skb must be at least ETH_HLEN,
> otherwise eth_type_trans triggers BUG_ON in skb_pull(skb, ETH_HLEN).
> This patch makes sure the linear part is always large enough.
> 
> Without the patch, tun sets the linear part size to 0 if TUN_VNET_HDR
> is not set and the packet is too large to put in a linear skb,
> which causes BUGs for me.
> 
> BTW, it seems that this behaviour has been there for a long while, since at
> least v2.6.27 (commit f42157cb568c1eb02eca7df4da67553a9edae24a: tun: fallback
> if skb_alloc() fails on big packets), but started triggering for me only in
> v2.6.30-rc1, because of commit 33dccbb050bbe35b88ca8cf1228dcf3e4d4b3554 (tun:
> Limit amount of queued packets per device), which made all large packets
> non-linear.  Before that, most packets would still typically be linear until
> memory gets fragmented, which hides the issue.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>

I'd already fixed that a couple of days ago :)
-- 
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2009-04-16 23:50 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
     [not found] <20090416204556.GA5846@dhcp-1-124.tlv.redhat.com>
2009-04-16 20:56 ` [PATCH] tun: fix BUG with large packets without TUN_VNET_HDR Stephen Hemminger
2009-04-16 21:05   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-04-16 23:50 ` Herbert Xu

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).