From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH] loopback: packet drops accounting Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 01:59:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20090417.015914.09817926.davem@davemloft.net> References: <49E78DE5.10104@hartkopp.net> <20090417.013853.04495551.davem@davemloft.net> <49E84459.1060507@cosmosbay.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org To: dada1@cosmosbay.com Return-path: Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:50020 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1759884AbZDQI7X (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Apr 2009 04:59:23 -0400 In-Reply-To: <49E84459.1060507@cosmosbay.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: Eric Dumazet Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 10:56:57 +0200 > We can in some situations drop packets in netif_rx() > > loopback driver does not report these (unlikely) drops to its stats, > and incorrectly change packets/bytes counts. > > After this patch applied, "ifconfig lo" can reports these drops as in : > > # ifconfig lo > lo Link encap:Local Loopback > inet addr:127.0.0.1 Mask:255.0.0.0 > UP LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:16436 Metric:1 > RX packets:692562900 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 > TX packets:692562900 errors:3228 dropped:3228 overruns:0 carrier:0 > collisions:0 txqueuelen:0 > RX bytes:2865674174 (2.6 GiB) TX bytes:2865674174 (2.6 GiB) > > I chose to reflect those errors only in tx_dropped/tx_errors, and not mirror > these errors in rx_dropped/rx_errors. > > Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet Well, logically the receive is what failed, not the transmit. I think it's therefore misleading to count it as a TX drop. Do you feel strongly about this?