From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH] Software receive packet steering Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 00:25:24 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20090423.002524.32556359.davem@davemloft.net> References: <20090422.022120.211323498.davem@davemloft.net> <20090423065830.GN4593@kernel.dk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: hawk@diku.dk, therbert@google.com, shemminger@vyatta.com, dada1@cosmosbay.com, andi@firstfloor.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, Robert.Olsson@data.slu.se, jens.laas@ITS.UU.SE, hawk@comx.dk To: jens.axboe@oracle.com Return-path: Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:33668 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751607AbZDWHZc (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Apr 2009 03:25:32 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20090423065830.GN4593@kernel.dk> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: Jens Axboe Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 08:58:30 +0200 > On Wed, Apr 22 2009, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote: >> On Wed, 22 Apr 2009, David Miller wrote: >> >>> One thought I keep coming back to is the hack the block layer >>> is using right now. It remembers which CPU a block I/O request >>> comes in on, and it makes sure the completion runs on that >>> cpu too. > > Hack?! :-) I meant hack in the most positive sense :)