From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] [ISDN] Documentation patchset Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 05:39:02 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20090427.053902.262806706.davem@davemloft.net> References: <20090427.031323.64748515.davem@davemloft.net> <200904271345.35345.karsten-keil@t-online.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org To: karsten-keil@t-online.de Return-path: Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:44019 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753741AbZD0MjJ (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Apr 2009 08:39:09 -0400 In-Reply-To: <200904271345.35345.karsten-keil@t-online.de> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: Karsten Keil Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 13:45:34 +0200 > Hi David, > > On Montag, 27. April 2009 12:13:23 David Miller wrote: >> From: Karsten Keil >> Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 14:24:21 +0200 >> >> > Fixed one more typo and wrong From: lines. >> > >> > Add some useful documentation for the ISDN subsystem. >> > Orignal patches are from Tilman Schmidt. >> > I fixed some whitespace issues and added the URL for the CAPI 2.0 spec. >> >> This patch set does not apply at all to net-2.6 > > I do not understand this, the patches were created against Linus tree, but now > I checked out the net-2.6 tree and tried to apply them and it was successful, > no warnings, and indeed the affected files in Linus tree and in net-2.6 are > the same versions. To be sure that no MTA problem hit us, I used the mails > which were sent back from the list. > net-2.6 git tree was updated 15 minutes ago. > > Here what I did: Here they are in patchwork, they don't apply: http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/26362/ http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/26363/ http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/26361/ Oh I see what happened. IT'S THOSE STUPID "Date:" fields you added to the body of 2 of those patches. It caused patchwork to put them in the wrong order when I put them together into a bundle. Don't add extra email header fields like that, please! :-) I fixed it up and applied the patches.