From: Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>
To: Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Limit size of route cache hash table
Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 21:50:07 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090427115007.GC15891@kryten> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <49F5550A.1050805@cosmosbay.com>
Right now we have no upper limit on the size of the route cache hash table.
On a 128GB POWER6 box it ends up as 32MB:
IP route cache hash table entries: 4194304 (order: 9, 33554432 bytes)
It would be nice to cap this for memory consumption reasons, but a massive
hashtable also causes a significant spike when measuring OS jitter.
With a 32MB hashtable and 4 million entries, rt_worker_func is taking
5 ms to complete. On another system with more memory it's taking 14 ms.
Even though rt_worker_func does call cond_sched() to limit its impact,
in an HPC environment we want to keep all sources of OS jitter to a minimum.
With the patch applied we limit the number of entries to 512k which
can still be overriden by using the rt_entries boot option:
IP route cache hash table entries: 524288 (order: 6, 4194304 bytes)
With this patch rt_worker_func now takes 0.460 ms on the same system.
Signed-off-by: Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>
Acked-by: Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com>
---
Index: linux-2.6/net/ipv4/route.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/net/ipv4/route.c 2009-04-27 12:48:18.000000000 +1000
+++ linux-2.6/net/ipv4/route.c 2009-04-27 17:05:46.000000000 +1000
@@ -3397,7 +3397,7 @@
0,
&rt_hash_log,
&rt_hash_mask,
- 0);
+ rhash_entries ? 0 : 512 * 1024);
memset(rt_hash_table, 0, (rt_hash_mask + 1) * sizeof(struct rt_hash_bucket));
rt_hash_lock_init();
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-04-27 11:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-04-27 3:04 [PATCH] Limit size of route cache hash table Anton Blanchard
2009-04-27 5:17 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-04-27 5:47 ` Anton Blanchard
2009-04-27 6:12 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-04-27 6:36 ` David Miller
2009-04-27 6:47 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-04-27 11:44 ` Anton Blanchard
2009-04-27 11:50 ` Anton Blanchard [this message]
2009-04-27 12:40 ` David Miller
2009-04-27 6:35 ` David Miller
2009-04-27 6:11 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090427115007.GC15891@kryten \
--to=anton@samba.org \
--cc=dada1@cosmosbay.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).