From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: grant.likely@secretlab.ca
Cc: scottwood@freescale.com, Joakim.Tjernlund@transmode.se,
afleming@freescale.com, benh@kernel.crashing.org,
linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: Fix ucc_geth.c handling of phy 'interface' property.
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 02:12:03 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090428.021203.74435054.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <fa686aa40904271050kb3159cbw52c0c1dba3076f3e@mail.gmail.com>
From: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 11:50:20 -0600
> On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 11:36 AM, Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com> wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 09:36:13AM -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
>>> From: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
>>>
>>> Previous rework to ucc_geth.c to add of_mdio support (net: Rework
>>> ucc_geth driver to use of_mdio infrastructure) added a block of
>>> code which broke older openfirmware device trees which use an
>>> 'interface' property in the phy node to describe the connection
>>> between the MAC and the PHY. This patch removes the offending blurb.
>> [snip]
>>> prop = of_get_property(np, "phy-connection-type", NULL);
>>> if (!prop) {
>>> /* handle interface property present in old trees */
>>> - if (!phy)
>>> - return -ENODEV;
>>> -
>>> prop = of_get_property(phy, "interface", NULL);
>>> if (prop != NULL) {
>>> phy_interface = enet_to_phy_interface[*prop];
>>
>> The above test only makes a difference when there is no phy node -- so I
>> don't see how it was breaking device trees that had a phy node (with or
>> without an "interface" property). I can see it breaking fixed link
>> device trees, though.
>
> Sorry, you're right. I got myself confused when I was writing the
> description. This patch fixes breakage when using a fixed-link and
> there is no phy-connection-type property.
Patch applied with commit message fixed up.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-04-28 9:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-04-27 15:36 [PATCH] net: Fix ucc_geth.c handling of phy 'interface' property Grant Likely
2009-04-27 17:36 ` Scott Wood
2009-04-27 17:50 ` Grant Likely
2009-04-28 9:12 ` David Miller [this message]
2009-04-28 13:37 ` Grant Likely
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090428.021203.74435054.davem@davemloft.net \
--to=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=Joakim.Tjernlund@transmode.se \
--cc=afleming@freescale.com \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=scottwood@freescale.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).