From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca
Cc: mingo@elte.hu, dada1@cosmosbay.com,
torvalds@linux-foundation.org, shemminger@vyatta.com,
zbr@ioremap.net, peterz@infradead.org, jarkao2@gmail.com,
paulus@samba.org, paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, kaber@trash.net,
jeff.chua.linux@gmail.com, laijs@cn.fujitsu.com,
jengelh@medozas.de, r000n@r000n.net,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, benh@kernel.crashing.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] netfilter: use per-CPU r**ursive lock {XV}
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 08:00:31 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090428.080031.14741305.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090428144920.GA28942@Krystal>
From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca>
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 10:49:20 -0400
> .. and what's the point in making it generic if it can be replaced
> by a proper RCU implementation ? :-) I am not convinced of the added
> value we get in making it a generic header this soon. I would wait for
> other users to express similar needs, otherwise this could soon become
> an orphaned piece of locking code.
That is my opinion as well.
Anyways, here is a patch that builds, I haven't started working
on the commit message yet.
diff --git a/include/linux/netfilter/x_tables.h b/include/linux/netfilter/x_tables.h
index 7b1a652..086e976 100644
--- a/include/linux/netfilter/x_tables.h
+++ b/include/linux/netfilter/x_tables.h
@@ -354,9 +354,6 @@ struct xt_table
/* What hooks you will enter on */
unsigned int valid_hooks;
- /* Lock for the curtain */
- struct mutex lock;
-
/* Man behind the curtain... */
struct xt_table_info *private;
@@ -434,8 +431,79 @@ extern void xt_proto_fini(struct net *net, u_int8_t af);
extern struct xt_table_info *xt_alloc_table_info(unsigned int size);
extern void xt_free_table_info(struct xt_table_info *info);
-extern void xt_table_entry_swap_rcu(struct xt_table_info *old,
- struct xt_table_info *new);
+
+/*
+ * Per-CPU spinlock associated with per-cpu table entries, and
+ * with a counter for the "reading" side that allows a recursive
+ * reader to avoid taking the lock and deadlocking.
+ *
+ * "reading" is used by ip/arp/ip6 tables rule processing which runs per-cpu.
+ * It needs to ensure that the rules are not being changed while the packet
+ * is being processed. In some cases, the read lock will be acquired
+ * twice on the same CPU; this is okay because of the count.
+ *
+ * The write lock is used in two cases:
+ * 1. reading counter values
+ * all rule processing need to be stopped and the per-CPU values are summed.
+ *
+ * 2. replacing tables
+ * any readers that are using the old tables have to complete
+ * before freeing the old table. This is handled by reading
+ * as a side effect of reading counters
+ */
+struct xt_info_lock {
+ spinlock_t lock;
+ unsigned char readers;
+};
+DECLARE_PER_CPU(struct xt_info_lock, xt_info_locks);
+
+/*
+ * Note: we need to ensure that preemption is disabled before acquiring
+ * the per-cpu-variable, so we do it as a two step process rather than
+ * using "spin_lock_bh()".
+ *
+ * We _also_ need to disable bottom half processing before updating our
+ * nesting count, to make sure that the only kind of re-entrancy is this
+ * code being called by itself: since the count+lock is not an atomic
+ * operation, we can allow no races.
+ *
+ * _Only_ that special combination of being per-cpu and never getting
+ * re-entered asynchronously means that the count is safe.
+ */
+static inline void xt_info_rdlock_bh(void)
+{
+ struct xt_info_lock *lock;
+
+ local_bh_disable();
+ lock = &__get_cpu_var(xt_info_locks);
+ if (!lock->readers++)
+ spin_lock(&lock->lock);
+}
+
+static inline void xt_info_rdunlock_bh(void)
+{
+ struct xt_info_lock *lock;
+
+ lock = &__get_cpu_var(xt_info_locks);
+ if (!--lock->readers)
+ spin_unlock(&lock->lock);
+ local_bh_enable();
+}
+
+/*
+ * The "writer" side needs to get exclusive access to the lock,
+ * regardless of readers. This must be called with bottom half
+ * processing (and thus also preemption) disabled.
+ */
+static inline void xt_info_wrlock(unsigned int cpu)
+{
+ spin_lock(&per_cpu(xt_info_locks, cpu).lock);
+}
+
+static inline void xt_info_wrunlock(unsigned int cpu)
+{
+ spin_unlock(&per_cpu(xt_info_locks, cpu).lock);
+}
/*
* This helper is performance critical and must be inlined
diff --git a/net/ipv4/netfilter/arp_tables.c b/net/ipv4/netfilter/arp_tables.c
index 5ba533d..831fe18 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/netfilter/arp_tables.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/netfilter/arp_tables.c
@@ -253,9 +253,9 @@ unsigned int arpt_do_table(struct sk_buff *skb,
indev = in ? in->name : nulldevname;
outdev = out ? out->name : nulldevname;
- rcu_read_lock_bh();
- private = rcu_dereference(table->private);
- table_base = rcu_dereference(private->entries[smp_processor_id()]);
+ xt_info_rdlock_bh();
+ private = table->private;
+ table_base = private->entries[smp_processor_id()];
e = get_entry(table_base, private->hook_entry[hook]);
back = get_entry(table_base, private->underflow[hook]);
@@ -273,6 +273,7 @@ unsigned int arpt_do_table(struct sk_buff *skb,
hdr_len = sizeof(*arp) + (2 * sizeof(struct in_addr)) +
(2 * skb->dev->addr_len);
+
ADD_COUNTER(e->counters, hdr_len, 1);
t = arpt_get_target(e);
@@ -328,8 +329,7 @@ unsigned int arpt_do_table(struct sk_buff *skb,
e = (void *)e + e->next_offset;
}
} while (!hotdrop);
-
- rcu_read_unlock_bh();
+ xt_info_rdunlock_bh();
if (hotdrop)
return NF_DROP;
@@ -711,9 +711,12 @@ static void get_counters(const struct xt_table_info *t,
/* Instead of clearing (by a previous call to memset())
* the counters and using adds, we set the counters
* with data used by 'current' CPU
- * We dont care about preemption here.
+ *
+ * Bottom half has to be disabled to prevent deadlock
+ * if new softirq were to run and call ipt_do_table
*/
- curcpu = raw_smp_processor_id();
+ local_bh_disable();
+ curcpu = smp_processor_id();
i = 0;
ARPT_ENTRY_ITERATE(t->entries[curcpu],
@@ -726,73 +729,22 @@ static void get_counters(const struct xt_table_info *t,
if (cpu == curcpu)
continue;
i = 0;
+ xt_info_wrlock(cpu);
ARPT_ENTRY_ITERATE(t->entries[cpu],
t->size,
add_entry_to_counter,
counters,
&i);
+ xt_info_wrunlock(cpu);
}
-}
-
-
-/* We're lazy, and add to the first CPU; overflow works its fey magic
- * and everything is OK. */
-static int
-add_counter_to_entry(struct arpt_entry *e,
- const struct xt_counters addme[],
- unsigned int *i)
-{
- ADD_COUNTER(e->counters, addme[*i].bcnt, addme[*i].pcnt);
-
- (*i)++;
- return 0;
-}
-
-/* Take values from counters and add them back onto the current cpu */
-static void put_counters(struct xt_table_info *t,
- const struct xt_counters counters[])
-{
- unsigned int i, cpu;
-
- local_bh_disable();
- cpu = smp_processor_id();
- i = 0;
- ARPT_ENTRY_ITERATE(t->entries[cpu],
- t->size,
- add_counter_to_entry,
- counters,
- &i);
local_bh_enable();
}
-static inline int
-zero_entry_counter(struct arpt_entry *e, void *arg)
-{
- e->counters.bcnt = 0;
- e->counters.pcnt = 0;
- return 0;
-}
-
-static void
-clone_counters(struct xt_table_info *newinfo, const struct xt_table_info *info)
-{
- unsigned int cpu;
- const void *loc_cpu_entry = info->entries[raw_smp_processor_id()];
-
- memcpy(newinfo, info, offsetof(struct xt_table_info, entries));
- for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
- memcpy(newinfo->entries[cpu], loc_cpu_entry, info->size);
- ARPT_ENTRY_ITERATE(newinfo->entries[cpu], newinfo->size,
- zero_entry_counter, NULL);
- }
-}
-
static struct xt_counters *alloc_counters(struct xt_table *table)
{
unsigned int countersize;
struct xt_counters *counters;
struct xt_table_info *private = table->private;
- struct xt_table_info *info;
/* We need atomic snapshot of counters: rest doesn't change
* (other than comefrom, which userspace doesn't care
@@ -802,30 +754,11 @@ static struct xt_counters *alloc_counters(struct xt_table *table)
counters = vmalloc_node(countersize, numa_node_id());
if (counters == NULL)
- goto nomem;
-
- info = xt_alloc_table_info(private->size);
- if (!info)
- goto free_counters;
-
- clone_counters(info, private);
-
- mutex_lock(&table->lock);
- xt_table_entry_swap_rcu(private, info);
- synchronize_net(); /* Wait until smoke has cleared */
+ return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
- get_counters(info, counters);
- put_counters(private, counters);
- mutex_unlock(&table->lock);
-
- xt_free_table_info(info);
+ get_counters(private, counters);
return counters;
-
- free_counters:
- vfree(counters);
- nomem:
- return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
}
static int copy_entries_to_user(unsigned int total_size,
@@ -1094,8 +1027,9 @@ static int __do_replace(struct net *net, const char *name,
(newinfo->number <= oldinfo->initial_entries))
module_put(t->me);
- /* Get the old counters. */
+ /* Get the old counters, and synchronize with replace */
get_counters(oldinfo, counters);
+
/* Decrease module usage counts and free resource */
loc_cpu_old_entry = oldinfo->entries[raw_smp_processor_id()];
ARPT_ENTRY_ITERATE(loc_cpu_old_entry, oldinfo->size, cleanup_entry,
@@ -1165,10 +1099,23 @@ static int do_replace(struct net *net, void __user *user, unsigned int len)
return ret;
}
+/* We're lazy, and add to the first CPU; overflow works its fey magic
+ * and everything is OK. */
+static int
+add_counter_to_entry(struct arpt_entry *e,
+ const struct xt_counters addme[],
+ unsigned int *i)
+{
+ ADD_COUNTER(e->counters, addme[*i].bcnt, addme[*i].pcnt);
+
+ (*i)++;
+ return 0;
+}
+
static int do_add_counters(struct net *net, void __user *user, unsigned int len,
int compat)
{
- unsigned int i;
+ unsigned int i, curcpu;
struct xt_counters_info tmp;
struct xt_counters *paddc;
unsigned int num_counters;
@@ -1224,26 +1171,26 @@ static int do_add_counters(struct net *net, void __user *user, unsigned int len,
goto free;
}
- mutex_lock(&t->lock);
+ local_bh_disable();
private = t->private;
if (private->number != num_counters) {
ret = -EINVAL;
goto unlock_up_free;
}
- preempt_disable();
i = 0;
/* Choose the copy that is on our node */
- loc_cpu_entry = private->entries[smp_processor_id()];
+ curcpu = smp_processor_id();
+ loc_cpu_entry = private->entries[curcpu];
+ xt_info_wrlock(curcpu);
ARPT_ENTRY_ITERATE(loc_cpu_entry,
private->size,
add_counter_to_entry,
paddc,
&i);
- preempt_enable();
+ xt_info_wrunlock(curcpu);
unlock_up_free:
- mutex_unlock(&t->lock);
-
+ local_bh_enable();
xt_table_unlock(t);
module_put(t->me);
free:
diff --git a/net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_tables.c b/net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_tables.c
index 810c0b6..2ec8d72 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_tables.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_tables.c
@@ -338,10 +338,9 @@ ipt_do_table(struct sk_buff *skb,
tgpar.hooknum = hook;
IP_NF_ASSERT(table->valid_hooks & (1 << hook));
-
- rcu_read_lock_bh();
- private = rcu_dereference(table->private);
- table_base = rcu_dereference(private->entries[smp_processor_id()]);
+ xt_info_rdlock_bh();
+ private = table->private;
+ table_base = private->entries[smp_processor_id()];
e = get_entry(table_base, private->hook_entry[hook]);
@@ -436,8 +435,7 @@ ipt_do_table(struct sk_buff *skb,
e = (void *)e + e->next_offset;
}
} while (!hotdrop);
-
- rcu_read_unlock_bh();
+ xt_info_rdunlock_bh();
#ifdef DEBUG_ALLOW_ALL
return NF_ACCEPT;
@@ -896,10 +894,13 @@ get_counters(const struct xt_table_info *t,
/* Instead of clearing (by a previous call to memset())
* the counters and using adds, we set the counters
- * with data used by 'current' CPU
- * We dont care about preemption here.
+ * with data used by 'current' CPU.
+ *
+ * Bottom half has to be disabled to prevent deadlock
+ * if new softirq were to run and call ipt_do_table
*/
- curcpu = raw_smp_processor_id();
+ local_bh_disable();
+ curcpu = smp_processor_id();
i = 0;
IPT_ENTRY_ITERATE(t->entries[curcpu],
@@ -912,74 +913,22 @@ get_counters(const struct xt_table_info *t,
if (cpu == curcpu)
continue;
i = 0;
+ xt_info_wrlock(cpu);
IPT_ENTRY_ITERATE(t->entries[cpu],
t->size,
add_entry_to_counter,
counters,
&i);
+ xt_info_wrunlock(cpu);
}
-
-}
-
-/* We're lazy, and add to the first CPU; overflow works its fey magic
- * and everything is OK. */
-static int
-add_counter_to_entry(struct ipt_entry *e,
- const struct xt_counters addme[],
- unsigned int *i)
-{
- ADD_COUNTER(e->counters, addme[*i].bcnt, addme[*i].pcnt);
-
- (*i)++;
- return 0;
-}
-
-/* Take values from counters and add them back onto the current cpu */
-static void put_counters(struct xt_table_info *t,
- const struct xt_counters counters[])
-{
- unsigned int i, cpu;
-
- local_bh_disable();
- cpu = smp_processor_id();
- i = 0;
- IPT_ENTRY_ITERATE(t->entries[cpu],
- t->size,
- add_counter_to_entry,
- counters,
- &i);
local_bh_enable();
}
-
-static inline int
-zero_entry_counter(struct ipt_entry *e, void *arg)
-{
- e->counters.bcnt = 0;
- e->counters.pcnt = 0;
- return 0;
-}
-
-static void
-clone_counters(struct xt_table_info *newinfo, const struct xt_table_info *info)
-{
- unsigned int cpu;
- const void *loc_cpu_entry = info->entries[raw_smp_processor_id()];
-
- memcpy(newinfo, info, offsetof(struct xt_table_info, entries));
- for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
- memcpy(newinfo->entries[cpu], loc_cpu_entry, info->size);
- IPT_ENTRY_ITERATE(newinfo->entries[cpu], newinfo->size,
- zero_entry_counter, NULL);
- }
-}
-
static struct xt_counters * alloc_counters(struct xt_table *table)
{
unsigned int countersize;
struct xt_counters *counters;
struct xt_table_info *private = table->private;
- struct xt_table_info *info;
/* We need atomic snapshot of counters: rest doesn't change
(other than comefrom, which userspace doesn't care
@@ -988,30 +937,11 @@ static struct xt_counters * alloc_counters(struct xt_table *table)
counters = vmalloc_node(countersize, numa_node_id());
if (counters == NULL)
- goto nomem;
+ return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
- info = xt_alloc_table_info(private->size);
- if (!info)
- goto free_counters;
-
- clone_counters(info, private);
-
- mutex_lock(&table->lock);
- xt_table_entry_swap_rcu(private, info);
- synchronize_net(); /* Wait until smoke has cleared */
-
- get_counters(info, counters);
- put_counters(private, counters);
- mutex_unlock(&table->lock);
-
- xt_free_table_info(info);
+ get_counters(private, counters);
return counters;
-
- free_counters:
- vfree(counters);
- nomem:
- return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
}
static int
@@ -1306,8 +1236,9 @@ __do_replace(struct net *net, const char *name, unsigned int valid_hooks,
(newinfo->number <= oldinfo->initial_entries))
module_put(t->me);
- /* Get the old counters. */
+ /* Get the old counters, and synchronize with replace */
get_counters(oldinfo, counters);
+
/* Decrease module usage counts and free resource */
loc_cpu_old_entry = oldinfo->entries[raw_smp_processor_id()];
IPT_ENTRY_ITERATE(loc_cpu_old_entry, oldinfo->size, cleanup_entry,
@@ -1377,11 +1308,23 @@ do_replace(struct net *net, void __user *user, unsigned int len)
return ret;
}
+/* We're lazy, and add to the first CPU; overflow works its fey magic
+ * and everything is OK. */
+static int
+add_counter_to_entry(struct ipt_entry *e,
+ const struct xt_counters addme[],
+ unsigned int *i)
+{
+ ADD_COUNTER(e->counters, addme[*i].bcnt, addme[*i].pcnt);
+
+ (*i)++;
+ return 0;
+}
static int
do_add_counters(struct net *net, void __user *user, unsigned int len, int compat)
{
- unsigned int i;
+ unsigned int i, curcpu;
struct xt_counters_info tmp;
struct xt_counters *paddc;
unsigned int num_counters;
@@ -1437,25 +1380,26 @@ do_add_counters(struct net *net, void __user *user, unsigned int len, int compat
goto free;
}
- mutex_lock(&t->lock);
+ local_bh_disable();
private = t->private;
if (private->number != num_counters) {
ret = -EINVAL;
goto unlock_up_free;
}
- preempt_disable();
i = 0;
/* Choose the copy that is on our node */
- loc_cpu_entry = private->entries[raw_smp_processor_id()];
+ curcpu = smp_processor_id();
+ loc_cpu_entry = private->entries[curcpu];
+ xt_info_wrlock(curcpu);
IPT_ENTRY_ITERATE(loc_cpu_entry,
private->size,
add_counter_to_entry,
paddc,
&i);
- preempt_enable();
+ xt_info_wrunlock(curcpu);
unlock_up_free:
- mutex_unlock(&t->lock);
+ local_bh_enable();
xt_table_unlock(t);
module_put(t->me);
free:
diff --git a/net/ipv6/netfilter/ip6_tables.c b/net/ipv6/netfilter/ip6_tables.c
index 800ae85..219e165 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/netfilter/ip6_tables.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/netfilter/ip6_tables.c
@@ -365,9 +365,9 @@ ip6t_do_table(struct sk_buff *skb,
IP_NF_ASSERT(table->valid_hooks & (1 << hook));
- rcu_read_lock_bh();
- private = rcu_dereference(table->private);
- table_base = rcu_dereference(private->entries[smp_processor_id()]);
+ xt_info_rdlock_bh();
+ private = table->private;
+ table_base = private->entries[smp_processor_id()];
e = get_entry(table_base, private->hook_entry[hook]);
@@ -466,7 +466,7 @@ ip6t_do_table(struct sk_buff *skb,
#ifdef CONFIG_NETFILTER_DEBUG
((struct ip6t_entry *)table_base)->comefrom = NETFILTER_LINK_POISON;
#endif
- rcu_read_unlock_bh();
+ xt_info_rdunlock_bh();
#ifdef DEBUG_ALLOW_ALL
return NF_ACCEPT;
@@ -926,9 +926,12 @@ get_counters(const struct xt_table_info *t,
/* Instead of clearing (by a previous call to memset())
* the counters and using adds, we set the counters
* with data used by 'current' CPU
- * We dont care about preemption here.
+ *
+ * Bottom half has to be disabled to prevent deadlock
+ * if new softirq were to run and call ipt_do_table
*/
- curcpu = raw_smp_processor_id();
+ local_bh_disable();
+ curcpu = smp_processor_id();
i = 0;
IP6T_ENTRY_ITERATE(t->entries[curcpu],
@@ -941,72 +944,22 @@ get_counters(const struct xt_table_info *t,
if (cpu == curcpu)
continue;
i = 0;
+ xt_info_wrlock(cpu);
IP6T_ENTRY_ITERATE(t->entries[cpu],
t->size,
add_entry_to_counter,
counters,
&i);
+ xt_info_wrunlock(cpu);
}
-}
-
-/* We're lazy, and add to the first CPU; overflow works its fey magic
- * and everything is OK. */
-static int
-add_counter_to_entry(struct ip6t_entry *e,
- const struct xt_counters addme[],
- unsigned int *i)
-{
- ADD_COUNTER(e->counters, addme[*i].bcnt, addme[*i].pcnt);
-
- (*i)++;
- return 0;
-}
-
-/* Take values from counters and add them back onto the current cpu */
-static void put_counters(struct xt_table_info *t,
- const struct xt_counters counters[])
-{
- unsigned int i, cpu;
-
- local_bh_disable();
- cpu = smp_processor_id();
- i = 0;
- IP6T_ENTRY_ITERATE(t->entries[cpu],
- t->size,
- add_counter_to_entry,
- counters,
- &i);
local_bh_enable();
}
-static inline int
-zero_entry_counter(struct ip6t_entry *e, void *arg)
-{
- e->counters.bcnt = 0;
- e->counters.pcnt = 0;
- return 0;
-}
-
-static void
-clone_counters(struct xt_table_info *newinfo, const struct xt_table_info *info)
-{
- unsigned int cpu;
- const void *loc_cpu_entry = info->entries[raw_smp_processor_id()];
-
- memcpy(newinfo, info, offsetof(struct xt_table_info, entries));
- for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
- memcpy(newinfo->entries[cpu], loc_cpu_entry, info->size);
- IP6T_ENTRY_ITERATE(newinfo->entries[cpu], newinfo->size,
- zero_entry_counter, NULL);
- }
-}
-
static struct xt_counters *alloc_counters(struct xt_table *table)
{
unsigned int countersize;
struct xt_counters *counters;
struct xt_table_info *private = table->private;
- struct xt_table_info *info;
/* We need atomic snapshot of counters: rest doesn't change
(other than comefrom, which userspace doesn't care
@@ -1015,30 +968,11 @@ static struct xt_counters *alloc_counters(struct xt_table *table)
counters = vmalloc_node(countersize, numa_node_id());
if (counters == NULL)
- goto nomem;
+ return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
- info = xt_alloc_table_info(private->size);
- if (!info)
- goto free_counters;
-
- clone_counters(info, private);
-
- mutex_lock(&table->lock);
- xt_table_entry_swap_rcu(private, info);
- synchronize_net(); /* Wait until smoke has cleared */
-
- get_counters(info, counters);
- put_counters(private, counters);
- mutex_unlock(&table->lock);
-
- xt_free_table_info(info);
+ get_counters(private, counters);
return counters;
-
- free_counters:
- vfree(counters);
- nomem:
- return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
}
static int
@@ -1334,8 +1268,9 @@ __do_replace(struct net *net, const char *name, unsigned int valid_hooks,
(newinfo->number <= oldinfo->initial_entries))
module_put(t->me);
- /* Get the old counters. */
+ /* Get the old counters, and synchronize with replace */
get_counters(oldinfo, counters);
+
/* Decrease module usage counts and free resource */
loc_cpu_old_entry = oldinfo->entries[raw_smp_processor_id()];
IP6T_ENTRY_ITERATE(loc_cpu_old_entry, oldinfo->size, cleanup_entry,
@@ -1405,11 +1340,24 @@ do_replace(struct net *net, void __user *user, unsigned int len)
return ret;
}
+/* We're lazy, and add to the first CPU; overflow works its fey magic
+ * and everything is OK. */
+static int
+add_counter_to_entry(struct ip6t_entry *e,
+ const struct xt_counters addme[],
+ unsigned int *i)
+{
+ ADD_COUNTER(e->counters, addme[*i].bcnt, addme[*i].pcnt);
+
+ (*i)++;
+ return 0;
+}
+
static int
do_add_counters(struct net *net, void __user *user, unsigned int len,
int compat)
{
- unsigned int i;
+ unsigned int i, curcpu;
struct xt_counters_info tmp;
struct xt_counters *paddc;
unsigned int num_counters;
@@ -1465,25 +1413,28 @@ do_add_counters(struct net *net, void __user *user, unsigned int len,
goto free;
}
- mutex_lock(&t->lock);
+
+ local_bh_disable();
private = t->private;
if (private->number != num_counters) {
ret = -EINVAL;
goto unlock_up_free;
}
- preempt_disable();
i = 0;
/* Choose the copy that is on our node */
- loc_cpu_entry = private->entries[raw_smp_processor_id()];
+ curcpu = smp_processor_id();
+ xt_info_wrlock(curcpu);
+ loc_cpu_entry = private->entries[curcpu];
IP6T_ENTRY_ITERATE(loc_cpu_entry,
private->size,
add_counter_to_entry,
paddc,
&i);
- preempt_enable();
+ xt_info_wrunlock(curcpu);
+
unlock_up_free:
- mutex_unlock(&t->lock);
+ local_bh_enable();
xt_table_unlock(t);
module_put(t->me);
free:
diff --git a/net/netfilter/x_tables.c b/net/netfilter/x_tables.c
index 509a956..020e97b 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/x_tables.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/x_tables.c
@@ -625,20 +625,6 @@ void xt_free_table_info(struct xt_table_info *info)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(xt_free_table_info);
-void xt_table_entry_swap_rcu(struct xt_table_info *oldinfo,
- struct xt_table_info *newinfo)
-{
- unsigned int cpu;
-
- for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
- void *p = oldinfo->entries[cpu];
- rcu_assign_pointer(oldinfo->entries[cpu], newinfo->entries[cpu]);
- newinfo->entries[cpu] = p;
- }
-
-}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(xt_table_entry_swap_rcu);
-
/* Find table by name, grabs mutex & ref. Returns ERR_PTR() on error. */
struct xt_table *xt_find_table_lock(struct net *net, u_int8_t af,
const char *name)
@@ -676,32 +662,43 @@ void xt_compat_unlock(u_int8_t af)
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(xt_compat_unlock);
#endif
+DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct xt_info_lock, xt_info_locks);
+EXPORT_PER_CPU_SYMBOL_GPL(xt_info_locks);
+
+
struct xt_table_info *
xt_replace_table(struct xt_table *table,
unsigned int num_counters,
struct xt_table_info *newinfo,
int *error)
{
- struct xt_table_info *oldinfo, *private;
+ struct xt_table_info *private;
/* Do the substitution. */
- mutex_lock(&table->lock);
+ local_bh_disable();
private = table->private;
+
/* Check inside lock: is the old number correct? */
if (num_counters != private->number) {
duprintf("num_counters != table->private->number (%u/%u)\n",
num_counters, private->number);
- mutex_unlock(&table->lock);
+ local_bh_enable();
*error = -EAGAIN;
return NULL;
}
- oldinfo = private;
- rcu_assign_pointer(table->private, newinfo);
- newinfo->initial_entries = oldinfo->initial_entries;
- mutex_unlock(&table->lock);
- synchronize_net();
- return oldinfo;
+ table->private = newinfo;
+ newinfo->initial_entries = private->initial_entries;
+
+ /*
+ * Even though table entries have now been swapped, other CPU's
+ * may still be using the old entries. This is okay, because
+ * resynchronization happens because of the locking done
+ * during the get_counters() routine.
+ */
+ local_bh_enable();
+
+ return private;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(xt_replace_table);
@@ -734,7 +731,6 @@ struct xt_table *xt_register_table(struct net *net, struct xt_table *table,
/* Simplifies replace_table code. */
table->private = bootstrap;
- mutex_init(&table->lock);
if (!xt_replace_table(table, 0, newinfo, &ret))
goto unlock;
@@ -1147,7 +1143,11 @@ static struct pernet_operations xt_net_ops = {
static int __init xt_init(void)
{
- int i, rv;
+ unsigned int i;
+ int rv;
+
+ for_each_possible_cpu(i)
+ spin_lock_init(&per_cpu(xt_info_locks, i).lock);
xt = kmalloc(sizeof(struct xt_af) * NFPROTO_NUMPROTO, GFP_KERNEL);
if (!xt)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-04-28 15:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 215+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <Pine.LNX.4.64.0904101656190.2093@boston.corp.fedex.com>
[not found] ` <20090410095246.4fdccb56@s6510>
2009-04-11 1:25 ` iptables very slow after commit784544739a25c30637397ace5489eeb6e15d7d49 David Miller
2009-04-11 1:39 ` iptables very slow after commit 784544739a25c30637397ace5489eeb6e15d7d49 Linus Torvalds
2009-04-11 4:15 ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-04-11 5:14 ` Jan Engelhardt
2009-04-11 5:42 ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-04-11 6:00 ` David Miller
2009-04-11 18:12 ` Kyle Moffett
2009-04-11 18:32 ` Arkadiusz Miskiewicz
2009-04-12 0:54 ` david
2009-04-12 5:05 ` Kyle Moffett
2009-04-12 12:30 ` Harald Welte
2009-04-12 16:38 ` Jan Engelhardt
2009-04-11 15:07 ` Stephen Hemminger
2009-04-11 16:05 ` Jeff Chua
2009-04-11 17:51 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-04-11 7:08 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-04-11 15:05 ` Stephen Hemminger
2009-04-11 17:48 ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-04-12 10:54 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-04-12 11:34 ` Paul Mackerras
2009-04-12 17:31 ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-04-13 1:13 ` David Miller
2009-04-13 4:04 ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-04-13 16:53 ` [PATCH] netfilter: use per-cpu spinlock rather than RCU Stephen Hemminger
2009-04-13 17:40 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-04-13 18:11 ` Stephen Hemminger
2009-04-13 19:06 ` Martin Josefsson
2009-04-13 19:17 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-04-13 22:24 ` Andrew Morton
2009-04-13 23:20 ` Stephen Hemminger
2009-04-13 23:26 ` Andrew Morton
2009-04-13 23:37 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-04-13 23:52 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-04-14 12:27 ` Patrick McHardy
2009-04-14 14:23 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-04-14 14:45 ` Stephen Hemminger
2009-04-14 15:49 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-04-14 16:51 ` Jeff Chua
2009-04-14 18:17 ` [PATCH] netfilter: use per-cpu spinlock rather than RCU (v2) Stephen Hemminger
2009-04-14 19:28 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-04-14 21:11 ` Stephen Hemminger
2009-04-14 21:13 ` [PATCH] netfilter: use per-cpu spinlock rather than RCU (v3) Stephen Hemminger
2009-04-14 21:40 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-04-15 10:59 ` Patrick McHardy
2009-04-15 16:31 ` Stephen Hemminger
2009-04-15 20:55 ` Stephen Hemminger
2009-04-15 21:07 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-04-15 21:55 ` Jan Engelhardt
2009-04-16 12:12 ` Patrick McHardy
2009-04-16 12:24 ` Jan Engelhardt
2009-04-16 12:31 ` Patrick McHardy
2009-04-15 21:57 ` [PATCH] netfilter: use per-cpu rwlock rather than RCU (v4) Stephen Hemminger
2009-04-15 23:48 ` [PATCH] netfilter: use per-cpu spinlock rather than RCU (v3) David Miller
2009-04-16 0:01 ` Stephen Hemminger
2009-04-16 0:05 ` David Miller
2009-04-16 12:28 ` Patrick McHardy
2009-04-16 0:10 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-04-16 0:45 ` [PATCH] netfilter: use per-cpu spinlock and RCU (v5) Stephen Hemminger
2009-04-16 5:01 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-04-16 13:53 ` Patrick McHardy
2009-04-16 14:47 ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-04-16 16:10 ` [PATCH] netfilter: use per-cpu recursive spinlock (v6) Eric Dumazet
2009-04-16 16:20 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-04-16 16:37 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-04-16 16:59 ` Patrick McHardy
2009-04-16 17:58 ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-04-16 18:41 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-04-16 20:49 ` [PATCH[] netfilter: use per-cpu reader-writer lock (v0.7) Stephen Hemminger
2009-04-16 21:02 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-04-16 23:04 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-04-17 0:13 ` [PATCH] netfilter: use per-cpu recursive spinlock (v6) Paul E. McKenney
2009-04-16 13:11 ` [PATCH] netfilter: use per-cpu spinlock rather than RCU (v3) Patrick McHardy
2009-04-16 22:33 ` David Miller
2009-04-16 23:49 ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-04-16 23:52 ` [PATCH] netfilter: per-cpu spin-lock with recursion (v0.8) Stephen Hemminger
2009-04-17 0:15 ` Jeff Chua
2009-04-17 5:55 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-04-17 6:03 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-04-17 6:14 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-04-17 17:08 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-04-17 11:17 ` Patrick McHardy
2009-04-17 1:28 ` [PATCH] netfilter: use per-cpu spinlock rather than RCU (v3) Paul E. McKenney
2009-04-17 2:19 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-04-17 5:05 ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-04-17 5:44 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-04-17 14:51 ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-04-17 4:50 ` Stephen Hemminger
2009-04-17 5:08 ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-04-17 5:16 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-04-17 5:40 ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-04-17 8:07 ` David Miller
2009-04-17 15:00 ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-04-17 17:22 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-04-17 17:32 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-04-17 6:12 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-04-17 16:33 ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-04-17 16:51 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-04-17 21:29 ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-04-18 9:40 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2009-04-18 14:14 ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-04-20 17:34 ` [PATCH] netfilter: use per-cpu recursive lock (v10) Stephen Hemminger
2009-04-20 18:21 ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-04-20 18:25 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-04-20 20:32 ` Stephen Hemminger
2009-04-20 20:42 ` Stephen Hemminger
2009-04-20 21:05 ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-04-20 21:23 ` Paul Mackerras
2009-04-20 21:58 ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-04-20 22:41 ` Paul Mackerras
2009-04-20 23:01 ` [PATCH] netfilter: use per-cpu recursive lock (v11) Stephen Hemminger
2009-04-21 3:41 ` Lai Jiangshan
2009-04-21 3:56 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-04-21 4:15 ` Stephen Hemminger
2009-04-21 5:22 ` Lai Jiangshan
2009-04-21 5:45 ` Stephen Hemminger
2009-04-21 6:52 ` Lai Jiangshan
2009-04-21 8:16 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2009-04-21 8:42 ` Lai Jiangshan
2009-04-21 8:49 ` David Miller
2009-04-21 8:55 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-04-21 9:22 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2009-04-21 9:34 ` Lai Jiangshan
2009-04-21 5:34 ` Lai Jiangshan
2009-04-21 4:59 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-04-21 16:37 ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-04-21 5:46 ` Lai Jiangshan
2009-04-21 16:13 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-04-21 16:43 ` Stephen Hemminger
2009-04-21 16:50 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-04-21 18:02 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-04-21 18:15 ` Stephen Hemminger
2009-04-21 19:10 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-04-21 19:46 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-04-22 7:35 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-04-22 8:53 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-04-22 10:13 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-04-22 11:26 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-04-22 11:39 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-04-22 11:18 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-04-22 15:19 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-04-22 16:57 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-04-22 17:18 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-04-22 20:46 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-04-22 17:48 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-04-21 21:04 ` Stephen Hemminger
2009-04-22 8:00 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-04-21 19:39 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-04-21 21:39 ` [PATCH] netfilter: use per-cpu recursive lock (v13) Stephen Hemminger
2009-04-22 4:17 ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-04-22 14:57 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-04-22 15:32 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-04-24 4:09 ` [PATCH] netfilter: use per-CPU recursive lock {XIV} Stephen Hemminger
2009-04-24 4:58 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-04-24 15:33 ` Patrick McHardy
2009-04-24 16:18 ` Stephen Hemminger
2009-04-24 20:43 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-04-25 20:30 ` [PATCH] netfilter: iptables no lockdep is needed Stephen Hemminger
2009-04-26 8:18 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-04-26 18:24 ` [PATCH] netfilter: use per-CPU recursive lock {XV} Eric Dumazet
2009-04-26 18:56 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-04-26 21:57 ` Stephen Hemminger
2009-04-26 22:32 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-04-27 17:44 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-04-27 18:30 ` [PATCH] netfilter: use per-CPU r**ursive " Stephen Hemminger
2009-04-27 18:54 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-04-27 19:06 ` Stephen Hemminger
2009-04-27 19:46 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-04-27 19:48 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-04-27 20:36 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2009-04-27 20:58 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-04-27 21:40 ` Stephen Hemminger
2009-04-27 22:24 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-04-27 23:01 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-04-27 23:03 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-04-28 6:58 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-04-28 11:53 ` David Miller
2009-04-28 12:40 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-04-28 13:43 ` David Miller
2009-04-28 13:52 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-04-28 14:37 ` David Miller
2009-04-28 14:49 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-04-28 15:00 ` David Miller [this message]
2009-04-28 16:24 ` [PATCH] netfilter: revised locking for x_tables Stephen Hemminger
2009-04-28 16:50 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-04-28 16:55 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-04-29 5:37 ` David Miller
[not found] ` <20090428.223708.168741998.davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q@public.gmane.org>
2009-04-30 3:26 ` Jeff Chua
[not found] ` <b6a2187b0904292026k7d6107a7vcdc761d4149f40aa-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2009-04-30 3:31 ` David Miller
2009-05-01 8:38 ` [PATCH] netfilter: use likely() in xt_info_rdlock_bh() Eric Dumazet
2009-05-01 16:10 ` David Miller
2009-04-28 15:42 ` [PATCH] netfilter: use per-CPU r**ursive lock {XV} Paul E. McKenney
2009-04-28 17:35 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-04-28 15:09 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-04-27 23:32 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-04-28 7:41 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-04-28 14:22 ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-04-28 7:42 ` Jan Engelhardt
2009-04-26 19:31 ` [PATCH] netfilter: use per-CPU recursive " Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-04-26 20:55 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-04-26 21:39 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-04-21 18:34 ` [PATCH] netfilter: use per-cpu recursive lock (v11) Paul E. McKenney
2009-04-21 20:14 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-04-20 23:44 ` [PATCH] netfilter: use per-cpu recursive lock (v10) Paul E. McKenney
2009-04-16 0:02 ` [PATCH] netfilter: use per-cpu spinlock rather than RCU (v3) Linus Torvalds
2009-04-16 6:26 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-04-16 14:33 ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-04-15 3:23 ` David Miller
2009-04-14 17:19 ` [PATCH] netfilter: use per-cpu spinlock rather than RCU Stephen Hemminger
2009-04-11 15:50 ` iptables very slow after commit 784544739a25c30637397ace5489eeb6e15d7d49 Stephen Hemminger
2009-04-11 17:43 ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-04-11 18:57 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-04-12 0:34 ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-04-12 7:23 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2009-04-12 16:06 ` Stephen Hemminger
2009-04-12 17:30 ` Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090428.080031.14741305.davem@davemloft.net \
--to=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=dada1@cosmosbay.com \
--cc=jarkao2@gmail.com \
--cc=jeff.chua.linux@gmail.com \
--cc=jengelh@medozas.de \
--cc=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=r000n@r000n.net \
--cc=shemminger@vyatta.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=zbr@ioremap.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).