From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@vyatta.com>
To: Mark Smith <lnx-netdev@95022607b6285f9c5d5ea31ea9d8a7ac.nosense.org>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC, PATCH 2.6.29.2] Ethernet V2.0 Configuration Testing Protocol, revision 20090428
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 16:15:45 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090428161545.0612476d@nehalam> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090428220143.31395c24.lnx-netdev@95022607b6285f9c5d5ea31ea9d8a7ac.nosense.org>
On Tue, 28 Apr 2009 22:01:43 +0930
Mark Smith <lnx-netdev@95022607b6285f9c5d5ea31ea9d8a7ac.nosense.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Following on from my initial ECTP post on the 23rd of April, here is an
> updated revision.
>
> Changes:
>
> o The ectpping utility is now available at http://ectpping.berlios.de.
> Kconfig and Documentation/networking/ectp.txt updated to reflect it's
> availability and location
>
> o absolutely avoid an unlikely unsigned int msgs_len wrap around in
> ectp_linear_skb_ok() and ectp_nonlinear_skb_ok()
>
> o use skb_queue_is_first() instead of skb_peek() in
> ectp_queue_delayed_tx_skb()
>
> Patch below is against 2.6.29.2
>
> Feedback from some networking and sys admin people I've told about it
> has been positive - they all agree with the benefit of being able to
> perform "ping" style testing on an Ethernet segment without requiring
> IP to be configured.
>
> Any suggestions for improvement would be most appreciated.
>
> Thanks very much,
> Mark.
>
Why does this have to be in the kernel? Why not all in user space
with AF_PACKET?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-04-28 23:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-04-28 12:31 [RFC, PATCH 2.6.29.2] Ethernet V2.0 Configuration Testing Protocol, revision 20090428 Mark Smith
2009-04-28 23:15 ` Stephen Hemminger [this message]
2009-04-29 11:34 ` Mark Smith
2009-04-29 18:57 ` Stephen Hemminger
2009-04-29 21:29 ` Mark Smith
2009-04-29 21:35 ` David Miller
2009-04-30 9:36 ` Mark Smith
2009-04-30 9:42 ` David Miller
2009-04-30 10:39 ` Mark Smith
2009-04-30 11:03 ` David Miller
2009-05-04 9:29 ` Andi Kleen
2009-05-05 7:51 ` Mark Smith
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-04-30 11:16 Mark ZZZ Smith
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090428161545.0612476d@nehalam \
--to=shemminger@vyatta.com \
--cc=lnx-netdev@95022607b6285f9c5d5ea31ea9d8a7ac.nosense.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).