From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/8 V2] MX27ADS: Add CS89x0 support
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 00:19:20 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <20090429.001920.246948365.davem@davemloft.net>
References: <1240963405-24007-1-git-send-email-vbarinov@embeddedalley.com>
	<20090428.231946.27173581.davem@davemloft.net>
	<49F7FBC8.7090705@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, s.hauer@pengutronix.de,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk
To: vova.barinov@gmail.com
Return-path: <netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:40629
	"EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-OK)
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751403AbZD2HT0 (ORCPT
	<rfc822;netdev@vger.kernel.org>); Wed, 29 Apr 2009 03:19:26 -0400
In-Reply-To: <49F7FBC8.7090705@gmail.com>
Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <netdev.vger.kernel.org>

From: Vladimir Barinov <vova.barinov@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 11:03:36 +0400

> So I think there were no sense to send first 7 patches to netdev list
> in this case :)

It seems that I can't add this patch to the net-2.6 tree because
it depends upon those 7 previous patches, right?

That's what I'm concerned about.