From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [RFC, PATCH 2.6.29.2] Ethernet V2.0 Configuration Testing
 Protocol, revision 20090428
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 04:03:44 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <20090430.040344.225458257.davem@davemloft.net>
References: <20090430190644.4d116984.lnx-netdev@95022607b6285f9c5d5ea31ea9d8a7ac.nosense.org>
	<20090430.024259.228836764.davem@davemloft.net>
	<20090430200926.f1ae5e60.lnx-netdev@95022607b6285f9c5d5ea31ea9d8a7ac.nosense.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: shemminger@vyatta.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org
To: lnx-netdev@95022607b6285f9c5d5ea31ea9d8a7ac.nosense.org
Return-path: <netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:39084
	"EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK)
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755482AbZD3LDu (ORCPT
	<rfc822;netdev@vger.kernel.org>); Thu, 30 Apr 2009 07:03:50 -0400
In-Reply-To: <20090430200926.f1ae5e60.lnx-netdev@95022607b6285f9c5d5ea31ea9d8a7ac.nosense.org>
Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <netdev.vger.kernel.org>

From: Mark Smith <lnx-netdev@95022607b6285f9c5d5ea31ea9d8a7ac.nosense.org>
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 20:09:26 +0930

>> BTW, your email address is rediculious.
> 
> It works, so what's wrong with it? Nobody else has complained about me
> using these types of email addresses on public mailing lists. I can
> throw it away if I get too much spam, pointing the MX record of the
> subdomain to 127.0.0.1 or something similar.

And by using it you can also not get any more replies from me, it
truly is your choice. :-)

I also certainly am never going to apply a patch from you with a
Signed-off-by: or From: that uses one of those throw-away addresses
either.