From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jarek Poplawski Subject: Re: oopses since "net: Optimize memory usage when splicing from sockets" Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 14:47:05 +0200 Message-ID: <20090430124705.GA8589@ami.dom.local> References: <20090430031626.GM14729@mail.wantstofly.org> <20090430084321.GA2753@ami.dom.local> <20090430124036.GN14729@mail.wantstofly.org> <20090430.054040.31760584.davem@davemloft.net> <20090430124542.GO14729@mail.wantstofly.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: David Miller , netdev@vger.kernel.org To: Lennert Buytenhek Return-path: Received: from mail-bw0-f163.google.com ([209.85.218.163]:45651 "EHLO mail-bw0-f163.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755590AbZD3MsP (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Apr 2009 08:48:15 -0400 Received: by bwz7 with SMTP id 7so1778202bwz.37 for ; Thu, 30 Apr 2009 05:48:14 -0700 (PDT) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090430124542.GO14729@mail.wantstofly.org> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 02:45:42PM +0200, Lennert Buytenhek wrote: > On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 05:40:40AM -0700, David Miller wrote: ... > > Thanks for testing Lennert. > > > > I'll queue this up for -stable too. > > I don't see this in 2.6.29, since the offending commit was merged > after 2.6.29 AFAICS? Yes, David had a very good intuition some time ago, and opposed my -stable recommendation! Thanks for this, Jarek P.