From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: 2.6.27.18: bnx2/tg3: BUG: "scheduling while atomic" trying toifenslave a second interface to my bond Date: Mon, 04 May 2009 12:06:51 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20090504.120651.32573620.davem@davemloft.net> References: <1239657348.8944.529.camel@psmith-ubeta.netezza.com> <1241397581.6499.658.camel@homebase.localnet> <4086.1241463817@death.nxdomain.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: paul@mad-scientist.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: fubar@us.ibm.com Return-path: Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:59766 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751515AbZEDTG4 (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 May 2009 15:06:56 -0400 In-Reply-To: <4086.1241463817@death.nxdomain.ibm.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: Jay Vosburgh Date: Mon, 04 May 2009 12:03:37 -0700 > Paul Smith wrote: > >>Hi Jay/David/etc.; >> >>This patch is critical for me to properly use mode 6 (balance-alb) >>bonding; I assume it will be needed for others as well. I haven't >>checked to see if it's still necessary in 2.6.29/2.6.30, but I didn't >>notice it going into the latest 2.6.27.22, released today. >> >>Is this still unofficial? Is there an official patch on the horizon? > > David, please apply and queue for -stable: Greg just posted that there will be no further 2.6.27.x -stable releases after the one he just made.