From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: 2.6.27.18: bnx2/tg3: BUG: "scheduling while atomic" trying toifenslave a second interface to my bond Date: Mon, 04 May 2009 16:12:35 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20090504.161235.09270647.davem@davemloft.net> References: <4086.1241463817@death.nxdomain.ibm.com> <20090504.120651.32573620.davem@davemloft.net> <1241478312.23179.5.camel@deadeye> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: fubar@us.ibm.com, paul@mad-scientist.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: bhutchings@solarflare.com Return-path: Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:41411 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753108AbZEDXMl (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 May 2009 19:12:41 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1241478312.23179.5.camel@deadeye> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: Ben Hutchings Date: Tue, 05 May 2009 00:05:12 +0100 > On Mon, 2009-05-04 at 12:06 -0700, David Miller wrote: >> From: Jay Vosburgh >> Date: Mon, 04 May 2009 12:03:37 -0700 >> >> > Paul Smith wrote: >> > >> >>Hi Jay/David/etc.; >> >> >> >>This patch is critical for me to properly use mode 6 (balance-alb) >> >>bonding; I assume it will be needed for others as well. I haven't >> >>checked to see if it's still necessary in 2.6.29/2.6.30, but I didn't >> >>notice it going into the latest 2.6.27.22, released today. >> >> >> >>Is this still unofficial? Is there an official patch on the horizon? >> > >> > David, please apply and queue for -stable: >> >> Greg just posted that there will be no further 2.6.27.x -stable >> releases after the one he just made. > > It's 2.6.28.x that he's dropping now > , not .27.x - he'll > have to support the latter for years in SLES 11 anyway. Yes he just corrected me about this in private email.