From: Ming Lei <tom.leiming@gmail.com>
To: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>,
David VomLehn <dvomlehn@cisco.com>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
<linux-usb@vger.kernel.org>, <greg@kroah.com>,
<linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] initdev:kernel: Asynchronously-discovered device synchronization, v5
Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 23:47:25 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090505234725.5ab247db@linux-lm> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.0905041100500.3092-100000@iolanthe.rowland.org>
On Mon, 4 May 2009 11:07:52 -0400 (EDT)
Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu> wrote:
> On Mon, 4 May 2009, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
>
> > > > for normal device probing we already have infrastructure
> > > > though... wait_for_device_probe, driver_probe_done and
> > > > friends... (the scsi scanning thread is being converted to the
> > > > async infrastructure btw)
> > > >
> > > > do we need to invent more ?
> > >
> > > I suppose the usb-storage scanning thread could also be converted
> > > to the async infrastructure, although I haven't heard of anybody
> > > working on it.
> > >
> > > But the USB hub driver's thread (khubd) cannot be converted. It
> > > is central to the discovery of USB-based block devices. How
> > > would you handle that?
> >
> > take a ref in the driver_probe_done() sense, and release it when you
> > know you're done probing....
> >
> > at that point all existing infrastructure will just work.
>
> Isn't there still something missing? The wait_for_device_probe()
> routine would wait until all attached devices had been probed. But
> why should prepare_namespace() have to wait that long? Wouldn't it be
> better to wait only until the root device has been registered?
Yes, maybe David should merge the following patch into the patch
No.5(initdev:kernel: USB and SCSI block init device notification, v3).
Right?
diff --git a/init/do_mounts.c b/init/do_mounts.c
index dd7ee5f..22fd773 100644
--- a/init/do_mounts.c
+++ b/init/do_mounts.c
@@ -358,6 +358,12 @@ void __init mount_root(void)
#endif
}
+static int root_dev_done()
+{
+ return !!(ROOT_DEV = name_to_dev_t(saved_root_name));
+}
+
+
/*
* Prepare the namespace - decide what/where to mount, load ramdisks,
etc. */
@@ -398,12 +404,12 @@ void __init prepare_namespace(void)
goto out;
/* wait for any asynchronous scanning to complete */
- if ((ROOT_DEV == 0) && root_wait) {
+ if (ROOT_DEV == 0 && root_wait) {
printk(KERN_INFO "Waiting for root device %s...\n",
saved_root_name);
- while (driver_probe_done() != 0 ||
- (ROOT_DEV = name_to_dev_t(saved_root_name)) ==
0)
- msleep(100);
+ do {
+ initdev_wait(BOOTDEV_BLOCK, root_dev_done);
+ } while (!ROOT_DEV);
async_synchronize_full();
}
--
Lei Ming
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-05-05 15:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-05-02 2:25 [PATCH 1/5] initdev:kernel: Asynchronously-discovered device synchronization, v5 David VomLehn
[not found] ` <20090502022551.GA15600-CFZJ1or75eBPWxJt6d6B6bQa8qPdvLwY@public.gmane.org>
2009-05-02 13:31 ` Sergey Vlasov
[not found] ` <20090502133153.GA8116-2JxNCdI+WHxBDLzU/O5InQ@public.gmane.org>
2009-05-02 14:16 ` Alan Stern
[not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.0905021010200.23879-100000-pYrvlCTfrz9XsRXLowluHWD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org>
2009-05-05 0:33 ` David VomLehn
2009-05-05 0:31 ` [PATCH 1/5] initdev:kernel: Asynchronously-discovered devicesynchronization, v5 David VomLehn
2009-05-02 14:01 ` [PATCH 1/5] initdev:kernel: Asynchronously-discovered device synchronization, v5 James Bottomley
[not found] ` <1241272876.3639.27.camel-0iu6Cu4xQGLV0bN/WMK0Sm4KqUE0Tg80jeSHHoATDr/QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2009-05-02 17:55 ` Alan Stern
2009-05-03 23:21 ` Arjan van de Ven
[not found] ` <20090503162115.2dff79bd-wEGCiKHe2LqWVfeAwA7xHQ@public.gmane.org>
2009-05-04 14:30 ` Alan Stern
[not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.0905041026560.2961-100000-IYeN2dnnYyZXsRXLowluHWD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org>
2009-05-04 14:45 ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-05-04 15:07 ` Alan Stern
2009-05-05 15:47 ` Ming Lei [this message]
2009-05-05 15:53 ` Ming Lei
[not found] ` <d82e647a0905050853q4a1d5066ib71411cbef186c45-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2009-06-05 18:00 ` David VomLehn
2009-06-05 17:58 ` David VomLehn
[not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.0905021335150.26241-100000-pYrvlCTfrz9XsRXLowluHWD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org>
2009-05-05 0:55 ` David VomLehn
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090505234725.5ab247db@linux-lm \
--to=tom.leiming@gmail.com \
--cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arjan@infradead.org \
--cc=dvomlehn@cisco.com \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).