From: Vladimir Ivashchenko <hazard@francoudi.com>
To: Denys Fedoryschenko <denys@visp.net.lb>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: bond + tc regression ?
Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 23:47:59 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090506204759.GA16681@francoudi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200905062230.04594.denys@visp.net.lb>
On Wed, May 06, 2009 at 10:30:04PM +0300, Denys Fedoryschenko wrote:
> > What's interesting, the same 850mbps load, identical machine, but with
> > only two NICs and no bond, HTB+esfq, kernel 2.6.21.2 => 60% CPU idle.
> > 2.5x overhead.
>
> Probably oprofile can sched some light on this.
> On my own experience IRQ balancing hurt performance a lot, because of cache
> misses.
This is a dual-core machine, isn't cache shared between the cores?
Without IRQ balancing, one of the cores goes around 10% idle and HTB doesn't do
its job properly. Actually, in my experience HTB stops working properly after
idle goes below 35%.
I'll try gathering some stats using oprofile.
--
Best Regards
Vladimir Ivashchenko
Chief Technology Officer
PrimeTel, Cyprus - www.prime-tel.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-05-06 20:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-05-05 15:45 bond + tc regression ? Vladimir Ivashchenko
2009-05-05 16:25 ` Denys Fedoryschenko
2009-05-05 16:31 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-05-05 17:41 ` Vladimir Ivashchenko
2009-05-05 18:50 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-05-05 23:50 ` Vladimir Ivashchenko
2009-05-05 23:52 ` Stephen Hemminger
2009-05-06 3:36 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-05-06 10:28 ` Vladimir Ivashchenko
2009-05-06 10:41 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-05-06 10:49 ` Denys Fedoryschenko
2009-05-06 18:45 ` Vladimir Ivashchenko
2009-05-06 19:30 ` Denys Fedoryschenko
2009-05-06 20:47 ` Vladimir Ivashchenko [this message]
2009-05-06 21:46 ` Denys Fedoryschenko
2009-05-08 20:46 ` Vladimir Ivashchenko
2009-05-08 21:05 ` Denys Fedoryschenko
2009-05-08 22:07 ` Vladimir Ivashchenko
2009-05-08 22:42 ` Denys Fedoryschenko
2009-05-17 18:46 ` Vladimir Ivashchenko
2009-05-18 8:51 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-05-06 8:03 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-05-06 6:10 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-05-06 10:36 ` Vladimir Ivashchenko
2009-05-06 10:48 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-05-06 13:11 ` Vladimir Ivashchenko
2009-05-06 13:31 ` Patrick McHardy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090506204759.GA16681@francoudi.com \
--to=hazard@francoudi.com \
--cc=denys@visp.net.lb \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).