From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: question about softirqs Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 21:45:40 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20090512.214540.147824481.davem@davemloft.net> References: <20090512092348.GA29796@elte.hu> <1242120761.11251.324.camel@twins> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, paulus@samba.org, mingo@elte.hu, tglx@linutronix.de To: rostedt@goodmis.org Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linuxppc-dev-bounces+glppe-linuxppc-embedded-2=m.gmane.org@ozlabs.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+glppe-linuxppc-embedded-2=m.gmane.org@ozlabs.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org From: Steven Rostedt Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 08:20:51 -0400 (EDT) > I'm going to be playing around with bypassing the net-rx/tx with my > network drivers. I'm going to add threaded irqs for my network cards and > have the driver threads do the work to get through the tcp/ip stack. > > I'll still keep the softirqs for other cards, but I want to see how fast > it speeds things up if I have the driver thread do it. I think your latency is going to be dreadful.