From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.27.2] datagram handling routines : mapping/unmapping paged data in soft IRQ Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 22:09:31 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20090512.220931.138424766.davem@davemloft.net> References: <54466B0E862D654998371DCA86B6FE2F4B6DC1@adept-srv2.adept.local> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org To: Luc.Goria@adept-telecom.fr Return-path: Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:50795 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750843AbZEMFJf (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 May 2009 01:09:35 -0400 In-Reply-To: <54466B0E862D654998371DCA86B6FE2F4B6DC1@adept-srv2.adept.local> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: "Luc Goria" Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 10:48:37 +0200 > My company, based in France, develops, manufactures and markets VoIP > communication platforms. These interfaces are not designed to be used this way. And we are also not tied to how your external proprietary module does things. And if your code was upstream, we would fix it to use these interfaces properly. Therefore I have no reason to look at your patch. Sorry.