From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@vyatta.com>
To: andrei.popa@i-neo.ro
Cc: Robert Olsson <robert@robur.slu.se>,
NetDEV list <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [oops] with FIB_TRIE
Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 13:00:35 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090514130035.3cf14d19@nehalam> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1242302098.3219.13.camel@ierdnac>
On Thu, 14 May 2009 14:54:58 +0300
Andrei Popa <andrei.popa@i-neo.ro> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I recompiled the kernel with FIB_TRIE and no preemption and it doesn't
> oops anymore.
>
> On Tue, 2009-05-12 at 17:15 +0200, Robert Olsson wrote:
> > Andrei Popa writes:
> >
> > > I've used an vanilla 2.6.28.7 kernel without any additional patches with
> > > the following .config and when I do in quagga a "clear ip bgp * soft"
> > > when I have three full BGP sessions the kernel it oopses.
> > >
> > > With FIB lookup algorithm FIB_TRIE it oopeses. With FIB_HASH it doesn't.
> > >
> > > Pictures with the oops:
> > > http://89.33.136.9/oops/
> >
> > > The config file:
> > > CONFIG_PREEMPT=y
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > Getting somewhat worried as we use this for infrastructure since many years.
> > I've set up test and is trying to reproduce it.
> >
> > I'm running forwarding ~9.4 Gigabit/s @ 1.2 pkts sec and fib_lookups 40-200.000
> > lookups per sec. Routing table has 280.000 entries this is loaded/unloaded
> > via ip route with -batch to give load for insert/delete.
> >
> > A script is continuesly adding/removing the routing table under this load.
> > The time to install the full table is ~10 sec and same time to remove
> > (without netfilter ~5 sec) And this during this constant traffic load.
> >
> > The scripts and routing tables:
> > ftp://robur.slu.se/pub/Linux/net-development/trie-test/
> >
> > Drivers are niu, ixgbe Netfilter modules loaded but no filters. Kernel
> > 2.6.29-r2.
> >
> > No problems seen for 3 hours but I'll let this run overnight
> >
> > One difference to your config I see is PREEMPT. We use use
> > CONFIG_PREEMPT_NONE=y with the router/servers.
> >
> >
> > Cheers
> > --ro
> >
Maybe the rcu_read_lock needs to be rcu_read_lock_bh?
--
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-05-14 20:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-05-11 11:24 [oops] with FIB_TRIE Andrei Popa
2009-05-12 15:15 ` Robert Olsson
2009-05-14 11:54 ` Andrei Popa
2009-05-14 20:00 ` Stephen Hemminger [this message]
2009-05-14 21:55 ` Robert Olsson
2009-05-16 21:24 ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-05-17 13:44 ` Robert Olsson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090514130035.3cf14d19@nehalam \
--to=shemminger@vyatta.com \
--cc=andrei.popa@i-neo.ro \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robert@robur.slu.se \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).