From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH] tcp: tcp_prequeue() can use keyed wakeups Date: Sun, 17 May 2009 20:45:16 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20090517.204516.101149899.davem@davemloft.net> References: <1242178490.11389.20.camel@merlyn> <4A0A3E5A.6040702@cosmosbay.com> <1242227107.7145.13.camel@Maple> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: dada1@cosmosbay.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: john.dykstra1@gmail.com Return-path: Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:56716 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753621AbZERDpT (ORCPT ); Sun, 17 May 2009 23:45:19 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1242227107.7145.13.camel@Maple> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: John Dykstra Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 10:05:07 -0500 > On Wed, 2009-05-13 at 05:28 +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote: > >> To see a benefit of this patch, we would need two threads, one blocked >> in a recv(), >> one blocked in a send() on same socket (or a poll/epoll user with same >> bi-directional trafic) > > Agreed. I've applied this to net-next-2.6, thanks.