From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jarek Poplawski Subject: Re: [PATCH iproute2] Re: HTB accuracy for high speed Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 20:32:21 +0200 Message-ID: <20090518183221.GC2755@ami.dom.local> References: <20090517201528.GA8552@ami.dom.local> <20090518065629.GA6006@ff.dom.local> <298f5c050905180954m791c14eaxe1f4b2c92f952a2f@mail.gmail.com> <20090518175352.GB2755@ami.dom.local> <298f5c050905181123o55c35e74n24cd4ee2c07d8fca@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Stephen Hemminger , netdev@vger.kernel.org, kaber@trash.net, davem@davemloft.net, devik@cdi.cz, Eric Dumazet To: Antonio Almeida Return-path: Received: from mail-bw0-f174.google.com ([209.85.218.174]:38322 "EHLO mail-bw0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751326AbZERSc6 (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 May 2009 14:32:58 -0400 Received: by bwz22 with SMTP id 22so3378604bwz.37 for ; Mon, 18 May 2009 11:32:59 -0700 (PDT) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <298f5c050905181123o55c35e74n24cd4ee2c07d8fca@mail.gmail.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 07:23:14PM +0100, Antonio Almeida wrote: > Here's my .config Hmm... And if it's not a big problem I'd also ask you to try this test with 555000Kbit rate for 850 and 900 byte packets. (It can wait.) Thanks again, Jarek P.