From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ralf Baechle Subject: Re: [PATCH] bc47xx : export ssb_watchdog_timer_set Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 08:15:13 +0100 Message-ID: <20090520071513.GB24231@linux-mips.org> References: <4A11DCBF.9000700@free.fr> <200905191524.20421.mb@bu3sch.de> <20090519170957.GA23711@linux-mips.org> <200905191929.21082.mb@bu3sch.de> <20090519173503.GD2691@tuxdriver.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Michael Buesch , matthieu castet , linux-mips@linux-mips.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: "John W. Linville" Return-path: Received: from h5.dl5rb.org.uk ([81.2.74.5]:41739 "EHLO h5.dl5rb.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753037AbZETHPx (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 May 2009 03:15:53 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090519173503.GD2691@tuxdriver.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 01:35:03PM -0400, John W. Linville wrote: > From: "John W. Linville" > Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 13:35:03 -0400 > To: Michael Buesch > Cc: Ralf Baechle , > matthieu castet , > linux-mips@linux-mips.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org > Subject: Re: [PATCH] bc47xx : export ssb_watchdog_timer_set > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > > On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 07:29:20PM +0200, Michael Buesch wrote: > > On Tuesday 19 May 2009 19:09:57 Ralf Baechle wrote: > > > Maybe because I felt drivers/ssb/ was outside my jurisdiction - and unlike > > > what alot of people may seem to think I'm not a full time MIPS kernel > > > hacker. > > > > Ok nice. > > > > > I can deal with SSB patch if you so desire - but I have no experience with > > > SSB, so I'd have somebody to rubberstamp non-trivial SSB patches before I > > > queue them up. > > > > **Fwoo.. > > [stamp here] > > ..mppp** > > > > > > Done. :) > > > > > I can keep them either in the usual MIPS trees on > > > linux-mips.org or I could create a separate linux-ssb tree, depending on > > > what seems to be sensible. Also, reading the entry in the maintainers > > > file I wonder if netdev is really the list of a choice? > > > > Yes it is, because the bus is only used on networking devices. > > (Ethernet cards, wireless cards, and network routers) > > I don't think you need to create a separate tree. ssb is pretty mature. There > > won't be that many patches. > > OK, now I'm confused again -- should I take SSB patches, or is Ralf > going to do it? :-) My decoder ring says, I'll do it from now on :) Cheers, Ralf