From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.30-rc4] r8169: avoid losing MSI interrupts Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 15:14:10 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20090526.151410.109935435.davem@davemloft.net> References: <20090525.225503.173348268.davem@davemloft.net> <200905262022.24593.mb@bu3sch.de> <20090526.145211.37114439.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: dave@thedillows.org, michael.riepe@googlemail.com, romieu@fr.zoreil.com, rsantos@grupopie.com, m.bueker@berlin.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: mb@bu3sch.de Return-path: Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:56953 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755080AbZEZWOL (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 May 2009 18:14:11 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20090526.145211.37114439.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: David Miller Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 14:52:11 -0700 (PDT) > From: Michael Buesch > Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 20:22:23 +0200 > >> I didn't notice a CC:stable. >> I think this should also go to stable. >> Does somebody take care? > > I'll queue it up. Actually, this patch doesn't even remotely come close to applying to 2.6.29.4 So if someone wants this in -stable, they need to respin this against that tree and (if wanted) 2.6.27.x -stable as well.