From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [iproute2 patch]: Add 'ip tuntap' facility for managing tun/tap devices Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 13:43:31 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20090527.134331.149161719.davem@davemloft.net> References: <1243441938.18507.30.camel@macbook.infradead.org> <20090527093815.4ddf99de@nehalam> <1243442972.18507.32.camel@macbook.infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: shemminger@vyatta.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: dwmw2@infradead.org Return-path: Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:35649 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756142AbZE0Unc (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 May 2009 16:43:32 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1243442972.18507.32.camel@macbook.infradead.org> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: David Woodhouse Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 17:49:32 +0100 > On Wed, 2009-05-27 at 09:38 -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote: >> Almost all of iproute2 is based on netlink, I don't want to add non netlink >> interfaces. > > So you want to add a new interface to the kernel which duplicates the > one we've had for years, then make userspace which will only work with > newer kernels? I agree, Stephen just put in the ioctl() or whatever based support for TUN devices. We've done stuff like this before in iproute2 so your arguments against this are hogwash.