From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [iproute2 patch]: Add 'ip tuntap' facility for managing tun/tap devices Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 13:44:53 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20090527.134453.120974750.davem@davemloft.net> References: <20090527093815.4ddf99de@nehalam> <1243442972.18507.32.camel@macbook.infradead.org> <20090527100647.06f07e1f@nehalam> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: dwmw2@infradead.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: shemminger@vyatta.com Return-path: Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:53132 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756621AbZE0Uox (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 May 2009 16:44:53 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20090527100647.06f07e1f@nehalam> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: Stephen Hemminger Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 10:06:47 -0700 > Well if the kernel interface existed for years, there were obviously other > tools using it. Why do you have to cram that into iproute2? Because iproute2 is what we want everyone to use perhaps?!?!?!? Stephen, STOP THIS PASSIVE AGGRESSIVE CRAP. It's not becoming, and it's just delaying making iproute2 more useful by supporting tuntap devices properly.