From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] isdn: patches for 2.6.31 Date: Mon, 01 Jun 2009 03:04:34 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20090601.030434.141357758.davem@davemloft.net> References: <20090531-patch-00.tilman@imap.cc> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: karsten-keil@t-online.de, isdn4linux@listserv.isdn4linux.de, i4ldeveloper@listserv.isdn4linux.de, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org To: tilman@imap.cc Return-path: Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:51098 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755908AbZFAKEe (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Jun 2009 06:04:34 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20090531-patch-00.tilman@imap.cc> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: Tilman Schmidt Date: Sun, 31 May 2009 01:32:04 +0200 (CEST) > I would like to propose the following three patches to the Kernel CAPI > subsystem for inclusion in kernel release 2.6.31. > The first one was proposed four weeks ago and so far hasn't met any > protests. > The second one is a rather trivial bugfix and documentation improvement. > The third one just adds a few new insights about the workings of the > CAPI subsystem to the Documentation file, INTERFACE.CAPI. I'm not applying this patch series. Especially I dislike the second patch. First problem in the second patch. You're doing two things at once. You're adding function documentation and also adding a NULL pointer check. Second problem, the NULL pointer check is gratuitous. Document that the 'm' member has to be non-NULL and leave the check out. Thanks.