From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [GIT]: Networking Date: Mon, 01 Jun 2009 14:32:48 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20090601.143248.258478440.davem@davemloft.net> References: <20090601.032500.54712490.davem@davemloft.net> <1243867942.3015.18.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org To: marcel@holtmann.org Return-path: Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:45199 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750819AbZFAVcs (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Jun 2009 17:32:48 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1243867942.3015.18.camel@localhost.localdomain> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: Marcel Holtmann Date: Mon, 01 Jun 2009 16:52:21 +0200 >> Things are really winding down, and the bug fix rate is down >> to at best a trickle. It might be time to do that final >> release soon :-) > > can you give me quick update on this pull request: > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=124341070008320&w=2 Sorry that I overlooked this. Unfortunately, I almost entirely use patchwork to manage my work queue. So if you're pull request doesn't attach a patch it's possible that it'll get lost in my inbox. So I suggest attaching a patch to your pull requests, at least for bug fix work, just like John Linville does for wireless. That also let's me quickly review your work in-place in my mailbox before I even type the git pull command, which helps me a lot. Anyways, I've pulled in your tree, thanks.