From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH iproute2] Re: HTB accuracy for high speed
Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 12:36:36 +0000
Message-ID: <20090602123635.GC4239@ff.dom.local>
References: <298f5c050905181016w552b283q2bb2ec508433525a@mail.gmail.com> <20090521085116.GC2892@ami.dom.local> <298f5c050905221042t45017c5q8bc967d13c9b81cb@mail.gmail.com> <20090523073201.GA2766@ami.dom.local> <298f5c050905281113o10393c61ye3c0539d2b6efa20@mail.gmail.com> <20090528211258.GA3658@ami.dom.local> <298f5c050905291002j468aa6e6j9a28252507717660@mail.gmail.com> <20090530200756.GF3166@ami.dom.local> <298f5c050906020312r514c4638sfa2b504f55d71bc1@mail.gmail.com> <298f5c050906020445n3941b4ceic1167a4a028005bf@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@vyatta.com>, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	kaber@trash.net, davem@davemloft.net, devik@cdi.cz,
	Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com>,
	Vladimir Ivashchenko <hazard@francoudi.com>
To: Antonio Almeida <vexwek@gmail.com>
Return-path: <netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mail-bw0-f222.google.com ([209.85.218.222]:40352 "EHLO
	mail-bw0-f222.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1751799AbZFBMgk (ORCPT
	<rfc822;netdev@vger.kernel.org>); Tue, 2 Jun 2009 08:36:40 -0400
Received: by mail-bw0-f222.google.com with SMTP id 22so8117140bwz.37
        for <netdev@vger.kernel.org>; Tue, 02 Jun 2009 05:36:42 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <298f5c050906020445n3941b4ceic1167a4a028005bf@mail.gmail.com>
Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <netdev.vger.kernel.org>

On Tue, Jun 02, 2009 at 12:45:28PM +0100, Antonio Almeida wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 11:12 AM, Antonio Almeida wrote:
> > I'm getting great values with this patch!
> >...
> > I'll get back to you with more values.
> 
> The steps are much smaller and the error keeps lower than 1%.
> Injecting over 950Mpbs of tcp packets of 800bytes I get these values:

Nice values - should be acceptable, I guess. Alas this is not all, and
I'll ask you soon for re-testing HFSC (after another patch) or maybe
even some simple CBQ setup ;-)

Thank you very much for testing,
Jarek P.

> 
> Configuration	Sent rate		error (%)
> 498000Kbit	495023Kbit	0,60
> 499000Kbit	497456Kbit	0,31
> 500000Kbit	497498Kbit	0,50
> 501000Kbit	497496Kbit	0,70
> 502000Kbit	499986Kbit	0,40
> 503000Kbit	499978Kbit	0,60
> 504000Kbit	502520Kbit	0,29
> 		
> 696000Kbit	690964Kbit	0,72
> 697000Kbit	695782Kbit	0,17
> 698000Kbit	695783Kbit	0,32
> 699000Kbit	695783Kbit	0,46
> 700000Kbit	695795Kbit	0,60
> 701000Kbit	695786Kbit	0,74
> 702000Kbit	700703Kbit	0,18
> 		
> 896000Kbit	888383Kbit	0,85
> 897000Kbit	896289Kbit	0,08
> 904000Kbit	896389Kbit	0,84
> 905000Kbit	904542Kbit	0,05
> 
>   Antonio Almeida