netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: akpm@linux-foundation.org
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org,
	bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org, aviad.yehezkel5@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 13443] New: Scope 1 in multicast addresses in IPV6 should be node local
Date: Wed, 03 Jun 2009 21:37:23 -0700 (PDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090603.213723.03731994.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090603144031.2945f24d.akpm@linux-foundation.org>

From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 14:40:31 -0700

>> I think scope 1 in multicast addresses in IPV6 should be node local (according
>> to all the documentation + rfc I found on the web) and therefore pkt's with
>> such destination address should not go on the wire.
>> When I try to send a udp pkt with sock_dgram to such ipv6 address with scope 1
>> I see the pkt is going on the wire and I can catch it on the other side by
>> joining this multicast address.

It looks like we need an addr_type and device check in ip6_output().

But in my opinion this is a pretty bogus requirement.  It's so easy
for things like netfilter, the packet scheduler classifier, or
other entities to get the packet to be rewritten from loopback
to an externally visible interface.

      reply	other threads:[~2009-06-04  4:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <bug-13443-10286@http.bugzilla.kernel.org/>
2009-06-03 21:40 ` [Bugme-new] [Bug 13443] New: Scope 1 in multicast addresses in IPV6 should be node local Andrew Morton
2009-06-04  4:37   ` David Miller [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090603.213723.03731994.davem@davemloft.net \
    --to=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=aviad.yehezkel5@gmail.com \
    --cc=bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org \
    --cc=bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).